“…In studies measuring F&V accessibility ( Table 4 ) by geographical distance between residency and RFE, the majority (n = 15) reported no influence or a negative association of distance with F&V consumption or purchasing; ; ; ( Aggarwal et al, 2014 , Caspi et al, 2012a , Curl et al, 2013 , Drisdelle et al, 2020 , Hattori et al, 2013 , Hawkesworth et al, 2017 , Jack et al, 2013 , Liese et al, 2013 , Mason et al, 2013 , Mejia et al, 2015 , Murphy et al, 2017 , Ollberding et al, 2012 , Reitzel et al, 2016 , Thornton et al, 2013 , Yamaguchi et al, 2019 ). 7 studies reported a positive association between shorter distance or increased density/convenience to food stores and higher F&V consumption when measured using a geographical information system (GIS) tool ( Clary et al, 2016 ; Curioni et al, 2020 ; Duran et al, 2016 ; McGuirt et al, 2018 ; Pessoa et al, 2015 ; Thornton et al, 2012 ; Zhang and Huang, 2018 ) and 1 Australian study identified a positive association of food store density with vegetable consumption only ( Thornton et al, 2013 ). A study conducting field audits of healthy food outlets found that neighbourhoods with more healthy food outlets had a 26% lower odds of healthier food purchasing ( Mason et al, 2013 ).…”