Randomized control trials show beneficial effects of heparin in high-risk pregnancies to prevent preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. However, the lack of placental pathology data in these trials challenges the assumption that heparin is a placental anticoagulant. Recent data show that placental infarction is probably associated with abnormalities in development of the placenta, characterized by poor maternal perfusion and an abnormal villous trophoblast compartment in contact with maternal blood, than with maternal thrombophilia. At-risk pregnancies may therefore be predicted by noninvasive prenatal testing of placental function in mid-pregnancy. Heparin has diverse cellular functions that include direct actions on the trophoblast. Dissecting the non-anticoagulant actions of heparin may indicate novel and safer therapeutic targets to prevent the major placental complications of pregnancy.
IntroductionA small subset of reproductive-aged women require anticoagulation in the context of a mechanical heart valve 1 or to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism as in women with antiphospholipid syndrome. 2 When planning pregnancy, they mostly convert from an oral anticoagulant such as Coumadin to subcutaneous injections of heparin to avoid the potential embryopathy induced by transplacental passage of Coumadin. 3 By doing so, they expose themselves to relatively minor side effects such as skin bruising and, because heparin promotes bone loss, to the rare possibility of vertebral bone compression fractures and neurologic complications. 4 In this context heparin is a success story for women whose predecessors were counseled to avoid attempts at motherhood. More than 35 years ago the concept of placental anticoagulation was proposed for women in subsequent pregnancies after recurrent placental infarction. 5 Since then we have witnessed an exponential increase in the prescription of heparin to pregnant women for a wide variety of indications, based on a common theme that superior placental function can be attained via its anticoagulant properties. The fashion has spread widely according to claims that heparin promotes successful implantation after in vitro fertilization, 6,7 prevents recurrent miscarriages, 8 promotes better outcomes in the perinatal period, 9 and, finally, may be used vaginally to induce labor in full-term pregnancies. 10 A common aspect of these studies is the use of safer low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) in prophylactic regimes that have a low risk of serious side effects when used over a relatively short duration of time in pregnancy. However, the current cost per pregnancy to prescribe prophylactic LMWH is ϳ $3000, a significant burden to uninsured women in countries, such as Canada, with variable employer-based drug plans. Ongoing use of such drugs for these indications in pregnancy therefore deserves more rigorous evidence. Recent impressive but negative trials are making progress by limiting the scope of use in women with recurrent miscarriage. Heparins are complex macromol...