1998
DOI: 10.1080/00927879808826405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local rings of exchange rings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 2.5. Notice that, according to Theorem 3.5 in [4], every ring has a largest exchange ideal with respect to the inclusion (which might be the zero ideal). Proof: Clearly, if K 0 (I) = 0, then the connecting map δ vanishes and hence Theorem 2.4 applies.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2.5. Notice that, according to Theorem 3.5 in [4], every ring has a largest exchange ideal with respect to the inclusion (which might be the zero ideal). Proof: Clearly, if K 0 (I) = 0, then the connecting map δ vanishes and hence Theorem 2.4 applies.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following goal in this paper will be to find the largest exchange ideal of a Leavitt path algebra. We know that it exists by [6,Theorem 3.5] and here we will determine exactly which set of vertices generates it. This paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introduction and Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the class of rings generated by idempotents (which is closed by corners), the exchange property is stable by corners. To show this, suppose first that R is a ring generated by the idempotents it contains, and that every corner of R at an idempotent is an exchange ring; then R is an exchange ring by means of [7,Theorem 3.2]. Now, if R is a ring then every corner of R is exchange, as has been proved in the paragraph before.…”
Section: Morita Equivalence For Rings Without a Unit Element Local Rmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…(Exchange example.) The exchange property (see [7] for the definition) is stable by local algebras at elements, as shown in [7,Theorem 1.4].…”
Section: Morita Equivalence For Rings Without a Unit Element Local Rmentioning
confidence: 99%