2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07046-9_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Search for a Cargo Assembly Planning Problem

Abstract: We consider a real-world cargo assembly planning problem arising in a coal supply chain. The cargoes are built on the stockyard at a port terminal from coal delivered by trains. Then the cargoes are loaded onto vessels. Only a limited number of arriving vessels is known in advance. The goal is to minimize the average delay time of the vessels over a long planning period. We model the problem in the MiniZinc constraint programming language and design a large neighbourhood search scheme. The effects of various o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can use our framework to directly implement and solve sliding-window decompositions, simply by appropriately splitting the data. problem (CAPP) from the MiniZinc benchmark suite, 4 a simplified version of the problem described by Belov et al (2014). In CAPP, vessels arrive at different times.…”
Section: Sliding-window Decomposition: Cargo Assembly Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can use our framework to directly implement and solve sliding-window decompositions, simply by appropriately splitting the data. problem (CAPP) from the MiniZinc benchmark suite, 4 a simplified version of the problem described by Belov et al (2014). In CAPP, vessels arrive at different times.…”
Section: Sliding-window Decomposition: Cargo Assembly Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, many large offline optimisation problems can be better solved by decomposing them into smaller, simpler problems along a timeline. This popular approach is called sliding-window decomposition (Marquant, Evins, and Carmeliet 2015;Belov et al 2014), where the problem is decomposed into (usually overlapping) windows, each solved in increasing time order. In effect, this converts the offline problem into an online one, where each new window refers to some old parts of the problem (those overlapping with the previous window), and to some new (the rest in the new window).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These constraints are used in many applications. For instance, they are used to solve continuous casting scheduling problems [11], cargo assembly planning problems [5], university time tabling [12], and even carpet cutting problems [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their work models the operations at the terminal in a greatly simplified way and does not consider channel traffic while including a more sophisticated model of the rail operations. Belov et al (2014) also tackles the integrated system, including in-terminal operations, coal arrival scheduling and channel traffic rules, using constraint programming. Since Thomas et al (2013) and Belov et al (2014) use time-indexed models, their approaches require a sufficiently high granularity to be of practical interest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belov et al (2014) also tackles the integrated system, including in-terminal operations, coal arrival scheduling and channel traffic rules, using constraint programming. Since Thomas et al (2013) and Belov et al (2014) use time-indexed models, their approaches require a sufficiently high granularity to be of practical interest. Since the time slots are typically smaller than one hour, and the planning horizons under consideration are typically of the order of weeks, such methods tend to be very computationally demanding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%