Local Self-Governments in Hungary: Recent Changes through Central European Lenses

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the regulatory environment of the Hungarian system of local self-government based on the methods of legal dynamics and economic analyses in a historical perspective tracing events back to the aftermath of World War II. The starting point of the analysis is 1947, the launching of soviet type command economy in Hungary. Next is a detailed study of the regulation and evolution of local self-government since its beginnings in the early 1990s following the change of regime, with a brief international outlook on the post-soviet countries surrounding Hungary. In our economic analysis, emphasis is placed on the period following Hungary’s accession to the European Union, a period that held out considerable opportunities for Hungarian local self-governments, but ultimately evolved into bankruptcy. The article presents detailed reasons for the atypical nature of Hungarian local self-government indebtedness and the factors underlying this unfavourable process. Further on, the procedure of debt consolidation and the essential elements of the new regulatory environment created after 2011 are described. In a brief international comparison, debt portfolio developments are analysed through the examples of Slovenia, Poland, Slovakia and the Czech Republic as analogue Central European countries, in order to provide further proof of the atypical financial management of Hungarian local self-governments, i.e. non-compliance with the rules and the not always solid budgetary discipline. The focus of the research underlying this paper is the impact the Hungarian regulation of self-governments had on the financial sustainability of local self-governments’ financial management. The study confirmed the initial hypothesis that the business management rules set out with insufficient prudence, deficiencies in the control system, and excessive borrowing in foreign exchange led to bankruptcy of a number of local self-governments and consequently jeopardised the proper provision of public services.

From an active state-led financial policy to an active state-led financial policy : A taxonomical outline of Hungary’s public finances in the past thirty years

“…The prelude to the situation which unfolded by the autumn of 2008 was the government's intention to adjust the 2006 convergence trajectory, which focused largely on revenues and increased tax burdens on primary income owners while simultaneously reducing their incomes, but, since it hardly made any effort to address structural deficiencies, it was able to alleviate these problems only temporarily. From 2006 to 2007, the budget deficit to GDP decreased from 9.3 to 5.1 per cent, but due to a drop in external resources and the fact that the budget had previously been fuelled by overspending and then tightened, economic growth decreased from 3.9 to 0.4 per cent, while in the rest of the Visegrád region 22 it was 7 per cent on average over this period. The destructive effects of the world economic crisis found the Hungarian budget in an already exhausted state.…”

E-administracja: Skuteczna, odpowiedzialna i otwarta administracja publiczna w Unii Europejskiej

“…IV SA/Wa 1817/20 -Wyrok WSA w Warszawie z 26.02.2021 r., nsa.gov.pl) (26.01.2022). Podstawy prawne działania e-administracji a ochrona danych osobowych również spełnione przesłanki udostępnienia danych z rejestru PESEL zawarte w ustawie z 24.09.2010 r. o ewidencji ludności 36 .…”

“…a), pkt 2 DORA, art. 25,27,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Wzmocniony nadzór ma polegać w tym przypadku na możliwości zobligowania przez nadzorców podmioty finansowe do zawieszenia czy wypowiadania rodzących różnego rodzaju ryzyka umów z dostawcami, np.…”

“…76a § 2a k.p.a. w brzmieniu obowiązującym od 5 października 2021 r., jeżeli odpis dokumentu został sporządzony w postaci dokumentu elektronicznego, poświadczenia jego zgodności z oryginałem, o którym mowa w § 2, dokonuje się przy użyciu kwalifikowanego podpisu elektronicznego, podpisu zaufanego albo podpisu osobistego 36 . Odpisy dokumentów poświadczane elektronicznie 34 Zob.…”

“…369/2021 established The Beneficial Ownership Registers Interconnection System ('BORIS') as a decentralised system interconnecting the central national beneficial ownership registers with the European e-Justice Portal through the European Central Platform. 36 With BORIS, data of beneficial owners and the entities in which they play this role are to be collected from national systems and published in the European e-Justice Portal, as is already done to some extent for commercial registers. With the simultaneous standardization of the scope of data collected in the national systems, the idea of interconnection of systems may prove effective.…”