2017 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/camsap.2017.8313119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local strong convexity of maximum-likelihood TDOA-Based source localization and its algorithmic implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we give an explicit estimate of the size of the strong convexity region. We remark that similar results have previously been established for a time-difference-of-arrival (TDOA)-based least-squares loss function [32]. However, to the best of our knowledge, our results for the TOA-based least-squares loss function are new and can be of independent interest.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, we give an explicit estimate of the size of the strong convexity region. We remark that similar results have previously been established for a time-difference-of-arrival (TDOA)-based least-squares loss function [32]. However, to the best of our knowledge, our results for the TOA-based least-squares loss function are new and can be of independent interest.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A possible future direction is to design and analyze online methods for TDOA-based tracking, which corresponds to a sequential version of the TDOA-based source localization problem (see, e.g., [38] and the references therein). One possible approach is to combine the results in [32] with the techniques developed in this paper. Another future direction is to study the performance of different online methods for solving the TOA-based tracking problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there has been a growing body of literature exploring the design and analysis of fast methods for tackling non-convex formulations that arise in applications. These include deep neural networks [32,33], low-rank matrix recovery [12,23], phase retrieval [27,35], source localization [24,31], and synchronization [25,39]. As these works show, the non-convex formulations in question often possess structures that can be exploited by simple and scalable methods, thereby allowing optimal solutions of those formulations to be found efficiently.…”
Section: Our Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the computation cost of the grid searching methods, Huang et al [13] proposed to utilize the Levenberg-Marquardt (L-M) algorithm to solve the localization problem after the phase unwrapping. Even though this localization problem is non-convex, it locally exhibits a strong convexity at an optimal solution [14]. So the performance of the L-M algorithm highly depends on the initialization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%