2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local structure and magnetic properties of Fe-doped SnO 2 films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work of the other group reporting shows that the lattice distortion induced by co-doping Fe-SnO 2 enhance ferromagnetic saturation magnetization of the compared with not co-doped one [26]. As shown in Figure 7 oxygen vacancies has a great impact on the FM property of Fe doped SnO 2 [50]. The ferromagnetic behavior of Fe-doped SnO 2 thin films is caused by the coupling of ferric ions through an electron trapped in an oxygen vacancy [60].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The work of the other group reporting shows that the lattice distortion induced by co-doping Fe-SnO 2 enhance ferromagnetic saturation magnetization of the compared with not co-doped one [26]. As shown in Figure 7 oxygen vacancies has a great impact on the FM property of Fe doped SnO 2 [50]. The ferromagnetic behavior of Fe-doped SnO 2 thin films is caused by the coupling of ferric ions through an electron trapped in an oxygen vacancy [60].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Sn 1−x Fe x O 2 film hysteresis loops with different concentration at 300 K. The inset is the difference in the concentration of Fe doping in saturation magnetization[50].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SnO 2 Fe and SnO 2 Fe/Pt samples show a pair of peak maxima at 1.27, 2.6 and 1.35, 2.7 Å, respectively. In the case of SnO 2 Fe, the peaks significantly shift from the standard Fe 3 O 4 (1.40 and 2.8 Å), 75 which may be due to its lattice intercalation in SnO 2 , whereas the peak from SnO 2 Fe/Pt shows a minor shift from the standard Fe 3 O 4 ; hence, there may be an additional island of Fe 3 O 4 on the SnO 2 surface. This signal was not evident in the XRD analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast, nanocrystalline Sn 0.8 Fe 0.2 O 2 films had a Fe 2 O 3 impurity phase that displayed excitonic features due to 2p-3d hybridization. 49 The changes in electronic structure and magnetism of Fe-SnO 2 thin films grown by radio frequency magnetron sputtering 50,51 were attributed to bound magnetic polarons. Sn 1Àx Fe x O 2 thin films deposited by the spray pyrolysis method 52 exhibited secondary phases like b-Fe 2 O 3 and b-Fe 3 Sn as x changes from 0.078 to 0.396.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%