2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10044-018-0752-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local support-based partition algorithm for frequent pattern mining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Local support counts were computed and global support count for the itemsets were determined from the local support counts. The experimental evaluation showed that LSPA outperformed Apriori, Partition, and FP-Tree algorithms in terms of database access time [24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local support counts were computed and global support count for the itemsets were determined from the local support counts. The experimental evaluation showed that LSPA outperformed Apriori, Partition, and FP-Tree algorithms in terms of database access time [24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited efforts made to utilize the multicore feature of current processors LSPA [21] Proposed a partition-based approach that compares the local support against the global support to generate the resultant set of frequent items May classify some frequent items as infrequent and vice-versa PEMA [22]  Uses a combination of horizontal and vertical partitioning techniques  Mobile ARM agents incrementally integrate the locally mined frequent itemsets to produce the global set of frequent items  Relies on mobile agents for assimilating the results adding to the overall cost of the algorithm  Novel approaches such as multi-threading have not been employed here Adaptive-Miner [24] Makes execution plans before every iteration and selects the plan that minimizes time and space complexity Complex to design in terms of hardware and software required for communication PFIMD [28]  Uses DiffNodeset to increase the cardinality of N-list.  A 2-way comparison strategy is designed to reduce the time complexity of the algorithm Limited improvement in memory since DiffNodesets is not a very compact data structure.…”
Section: Pss-fim [18]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequent itemsets are then mined from each of the partitions concurrently. Kadappa and Nagesh [21] proposed an approach that involves dividing the dataset into as many partitions that are large enough to fit into the memory. For each partition, all those itemsets that satisfy the local support count are extracted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…number of records, q = 2 d − 1 is the total item set count, d is the unique item count, and w is the maximum record length [34]. On the other hand, the time complexity of the FP-growth algorithm is O(n.d 2 ) , where n is the number of records and d is the number of unique items [35].…”
Section: Mtarm: Multitask Association Rule Minermentioning
confidence: 99%