2002
DOI: 10.1177/089443930202000106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Television, the World Wide Web, and the 2000 Presidential Election

Abstract: Digital cable modems, wireless Internet service providers (ISPs), digital subscriber line (DSL) services, fiber optics systems, and Internet access through a growing number of direct satellite television providers have transformed the way that millions of Americans receive the latest news and information about political campaigns. Multilingual video, text, and audio files on candidate Web sites, dial-up Internet services provided through the Republican National Committee and the Democratic National Committee, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Finally, we should note that campaign strat- egies are dynamic in the sense that there is a constant reevaluation and reordering of the importance of each state as Election Day nears (Shaw, 2004). This reality, however, does not discredit a simple dichotomous classification of states for the 2000 election because adjustments in resource allocation as the campaign progressed were almost wholly confined to the states already designated battlegrounds (see Novotny, 2002). 13…”
Section: Classifying States By Competitivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 Finally, we should note that campaign strat- egies are dynamic in the sense that there is a constant reevaluation and reordering of the importance of each state as Election Day nears (Shaw, 2004). This reality, however, does not discredit a simple dichotomous classification of states for the 2000 election because adjustments in resource allocation as the campaign progressed were almost wholly confined to the states already designated battlegrounds (see Novotny, 2002). 13…”
Section: Classifying States By Competitivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13. According to Novotny (2002), days before the election "the Gore campaign became focused on what became known to staff in the inner circles of the campaign as the Trifecta: the states of Florida, Michigan, and Pennsylvania" (p. 64).…”
Section: Appendix (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%