2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.92.235443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local tunneling decay length and Kelvin probe force spectroscopy

Abstract: In the past, current-distance spectroscopy has been widely applied to determine variations of the work function at surfaces. While for homogeneous sample areas this technique is commonly accepted to yield at least qualitative results, its applicability to atomic-scale variations has not been proven neither right nor wrong. Here we benchmark measurements of the current-distance decay constant against the well established Kelvin probe force spectroscopy for four distinctly different cases with atomic-scale varia… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that we have dropped the zero field splitting and Zeeman terms of electron spin since they have no effects in this pure-dephasing model. For a weakly coupled nuclear spin, consider the Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) control with π-flips at time t p = (2p − 1)τ (where 2τ is the interval between pulses and p=1,2,...N), using the Magnus expansion [24,25], we obtain the nuclear spin propagator conditioned on the NV electron spin state as…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we have dropped the zero field splitting and Zeeman terms of electron spin since they have no effects in this pure-dephasing model. For a weakly coupled nuclear spin, consider the Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) control with π-flips at time t p = (2p − 1)τ (where 2τ is the interval between pulses and p=1,2,...N), using the Magnus expansion [24,25], we obtain the nuclear spin propagator conditioned on the NV electron spin state as…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LWF value for the ultrathin CuO film is about 4.0 eV. However, the STM tip condition can dramatically influence the absolute LWF value in which possible topographical artifacts [34] and the bias variations [35] could cause measurement errors. Therefore, the difference in LWFs under the same bias and tip conditions is more reliable.…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of qPlus sensors, KPFM could be combined with scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). This combination led to the seminal mapping of charge distributions at the atomic scale and a number of important insights into intramolecular charge distributions. ,,, However, a quantitative determination of the charge distribution within molecules and molecular layers remains challenging, and it is important to consider that the LCPD value is detected at a certain tip height …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%