2017
DOI: 10.1142/10570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Zeta Regularization and the Scalar Casimir Effect

Abstract: All rights reserved. This book, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without written permission from the publisher.For photocopying of material in this volume, please pay a copying fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. In this case permission to photocopy is not required from the publisher… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where λ is a real parameter related to the strength of the potential, G z := e i √ z |x| 4π|x| with Im √ z > 0 and H 2 (R 3 ) is the usual Sobolev space of order two. The non-negativity of A (necessary for a consistent formulation of the field theory; see [12]) is ensured assuming λ 0; in this case, A has purely absolutely continuous spectrum σ(A) = [0, ∞). Besides, note that the choice λ = 0 corresponds to the free theory where no delta potential is present (correspondingly, DomA| λ=0 = H 2 (R 3 )).…”
Section: The Reference Model and Zeta Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where λ is a real parameter related to the strength of the potential, G z := e i √ z |x| 4π|x| with Im √ z > 0 and H 2 (R 3 ) is the usual Sobolev space of order two. The non-negativity of A (necessary for a consistent formulation of the field theory; see [12]) is ensured assuming λ 0; in this case, A has purely absolutely continuous spectrum σ(A) = [0, ∞). Besides, note that the choice λ = 0 corresponds to the free theory where no delta potential is present (correspondingly, DomA| λ=0 = H 2 (R 3 )).…”
Section: The Reference Model and Zeta Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuing the analysis begun in Ref. [13], here the total Casimir energy for the above model is investigated within a general framework for zeta regularization developed in previous works [8,9,10,11,12]. In addition to a regular bulk contribution which is finite after renormalization, there also appears an anomalous boundary term which remains infinite even after implementing the standard renormalization procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Quantum field theory and the fundamental operator. In the present section we briefly recall the general setting of [31] for the quantum theory of a scalar field on a space domain with boundary conditions, possibly in presence of a static external potential; this formulation will be methodically employed in the sequel.…”
Section: The General Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This representation of the stress-energy VEV, depending on the regulating parameter u ∈ C and on the infrared cutoff ε > 0, is reformulated in Section 7 in terms of Bessel functions; this also allows to determine the analytic continuation of the map u → 0|T u,ε µν |0 to a meromorphic function on the whole complex plane, possessing a simple pole at u = 0. We compute the regular part of 0|T u,ε µν |0 at this point in Section 8 and subsequently evaluate the limit ε → 0 + of the resulting expression in Section 9; according to a general prescription of [31], these operations determine the renormalized stress-energy VEV 0|T µν |0 ren . The final expressions thus obtained for the non-vanishing components of 0|T µν |0 ren are reported in the conclusive Section 10; therein, we also analyze the asymptotic behavior of the renormalized stress-energy VEV in various regimes, discussing especially the expansions for small and large distances from the point impurity (see, respectively, subsections 10.1 and 10.2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if A is a positive operator whose spectrum σ(A) is discrete and free from accumulation points, then we could define A(z) := A z and ζ(A) is given by the meromorphic extension of z → λ∈σ(A)\{0} λ z (counting multiplicities); hence, giving rise to the name "operator ζ-function." This is precisely how Hawking [20] employed ζ-regularization, it has been used successfully in many physical settings (e.g., the Casimir effect, defining one-loop functional determinants, the stress-energy tensor, conformal field theory, and string theory [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,20,21,24,25,26,27,28,29,35,36,39]), and is related to Hadamard parametrix renormalization [14]. This approach has been fundamental for many subsequent developments as it allows for an effective Lagrangian to be defined [2] as well as heat kernel coefficients to easily be computed [3], and implies non-trivial extensions of the Chowla-Selberg formula [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%