2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localism and coordination under three different electoral systems: The national district of the Japanese House of Councillors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may actually hurt the ability to build a personal vote by reducing the time available for activities in the district (Høyland, Hobolt, and Hix 2017). Local political experience or birthplace have been used as measures of credible candidate ties to their district (Nemoto and Shugart 2013; Shugart, Valdini, and Suominen 2005). While we do not have data on birthplace, additional analyses find no statistically significant effect of the reform on the selection of MPs with local political experience (Table S.3.5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may actually hurt the ability to build a personal vote by reducing the time available for activities in the district (Høyland, Hobolt, and Hix 2017). Local political experience or birthplace have been used as measures of credible candidate ties to their district (Nemoto and Shugart 2013; Shugart, Valdini, and Suominen 2005). While we do not have data on birthplace, additional analyses find no statistically significant effect of the reform on the selection of MPs with local political experience (Table S.3.5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of research indeed shows that candidates who are born locally or have locallevel political experience are not only electorally more successful (e.g. Tavits, 2010;Put and Maddens, 2015), but also considered valuable resources by party selectorates in personalized systems (Nemoto and Shugart, 2013). Other work discusses how and which voters look for local candidates (Jankowski, 2016;Blais and Daoust, 2017;Collignon and Sajuria, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important underlying assumption of this argument is that voters use candidates’ attributes as informational shortcuts in elections (i.e., voters expect that candidates with strong local ties are better able to represent and promote local interests than those without such attributes). Numerous studies have demonstrated how legislators approach voters and cultivate personalized support under electoral systems with multi-member districts (Ames, 1995; Crisp and Desposato, 2004; Hirano, 2006; Nemoto and Shugart, 2013; Wood and Young, 1997). However, it remains unclear whether legislators exhibit certain behaviors in parliament as is expected from their personal attributes (e.g., whether legislators with PVEA pursue local interests in parliament).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%