2013
DOI: 10.7561/sacs.2013.2.251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locality and Applications to Subsumption Testing in EL and Some of its Extensions

Abstract: In this paper we show that subsumption problems in lightweight description logics (such as E L and E L + ) can be expressed as uniform word problems in classes of semilattices with monotone operators. We use possibilities of efficient local reasoning in such classes of algebras, to obtain uniform PTIME decision procedures for CBox subsumption in E L , E L + and extensions thereof. These locality considerations allow us to present a new family of (possibly many-sorted) logics which extend E L and E L + with n-a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, each set S + and S − contains at most one restriction of the form (≤, x) and at most one restriction of the form (≥, x) as a consequence of the transformation rules (17)-(20). Therefore (10) and (11) hold. Table 5 is safe.…”
Section: Lemma 2 Let (S + S − ) Be a Non-trivial Constraint Over Anmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, each set S + and S − contains at most one restriction of the form (≤, x) and at most one restriction of the form (≥, x) as a consequence of the transformation rules (17)-(20). Therefore (10) and (11) hold. Table 5 is safe.…”
Section: Lemma 2 Let (S + S − ) Be a Non-trivial Constraint Over Anmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Another related polynomial extension of EL has been considered by Viorica Sofronie-Stokkermans [10], where in addition to the standard concept constructors in EL, one can use concept of the form ↓m, ↑n, and [m; n], interpreted as (semi-)intervals over a partially ordered set (P, <). The difference with the results discussed before, is that the domain P and therefore the values of the end-point parameters m and n are not fixed but can be chosen arbitrarily for every interpretation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unification was originally not introduced for Description Logics, but for equational theories [7]. In [26,4] it was shown that equivalence and unification in EL are the same as the word problem and unification, respectively, in the equational theory bSLmO of bounded (meet-)semilattices with monotone operators. The signature Σ bSLmO of this equational theory consists of a binary function symbol ∧, a constant symbol 1, and finitely many unary function symbols f 1 , .…”
Section: Connection To Other Unification Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Вопросы сложности модальных логик в ограниченных языках рассматривались ранее преимущественно в контексте дескрипционных логик. В работах [8]- [11] в дескрипционной постановке исследуется сложность задачи, представимой в модальных терминах следующим образом. Пусть формулы построены из переменных, связок ⊤, ⊥, ∧ и не более чем счетного множества связок ♦ .…”
unclassified