2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization and the interface between quantum mechanics, quantum field theory and quantum gravity II

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas the first and third subsection are extensions of already published results [2][3][4], the derivation of the BMS symmetry from null-space holography is new.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Whereas the first and third subsection are extensions of already published results [2][3][4], the derivation of the BMS symmetry from null-space holography is new.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The most prominent case is the lightfront (LF) holography which is essentially the old lightfront quantization but now with a more careful formulation of what in the old days has been always neglected, namely the relation with the original bulk description. 7 From the point of symmetries, the restriction of the global bulk to the LF leaves a 7-parametric subgroup of the 10-parametric Poincaré group of 4-dimensional Minkowski spacetime: 5 parameters account for a lightlike translation, a lightlike dilation (the wedgepreserving boost transformation projected onto the LF) and the 3-parametric transverse Euclidean group, whereas the remaining two parameters are less obvious since they are the 2 "translations" of the Wigner little group (3 dimensional Euclidean subgroup of the 6 parametric Lorentzgroup) which leaves the lightray invariant [2][3][4].…”
Section: Holography On Null-surfaces and The Absence Of Transverse Vamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations