1998
DOI: 10.1093/emboj/17.23.7118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of a protein–DNA interface by random mutagenesis

Abstract: The type I restriction and modification enzymes do not possess obvious DNA-binding motifs within their target recognition domains (TRDs) of 150-180 amino acids. To identify residues involved in DNA recognition, changes were made in the amino-TRD of EcoKI by random mutagenesis. Most of the 101 substitutions affecting 79 residues had no effect on the phenotype. Changes at only seven positions caused the loss of restriction and modification activities. The seven residues identified by mutation are not randomly di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(67 reference statements)
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems significant that the amino acid sequences and predicted secondary structures of type I enzymes have led to model structures similar to those deduced experimentally for type II enzymes, in particular, the active site of type I methyltransferases (44) and the regions of the TRDs located close to the DNA target (131,166). Irrespective of family, or even type, the evidence from the protein domains is consistent with the concept that R-M systems have common building blocks.…”
Section: Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It seems significant that the amino acid sequences and predicted secondary structures of type I enzymes have led to model structures similar to those deduced experimentally for type II enzymes, in particular, the active site of type I methyltransferases (44) and the regions of the TRDs located close to the DNA target (131,166). Irrespective of family, or even type, the evidence from the protein domains is consistent with the concept that R-M systems have common building blocks.…”
Section: Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The experimental approach of O'Neill et al (131) aimed to localize the protein-DNA interface by random mutagenesis. It was anticipated that amino acids that could be changed without loss of R-M activity were unlikely to be involved in target recognition, while substitutions that resulted in an r Ϫ m Ϫ phenotype would include amino acids involved in a specific interaction with DNA.…”
Section: Specificity Subunit-hsdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among these, two loops (between ␤6 and ␤7 and between ␤8 and ␤9) could be aligned to the DNA binding regions that were experimentally confirmed by random point mutagenesis studies in the type IA R-M enzyme EcoKI (29). Transformation of the bound DNA on the TaqI-MTase into the DNA binding clefts of TRDs provides each TRD with a DNA complex model, where the double helical DNA model is bound by using its major groove.…”
Section: Figure Of Merit ϭ ͉͚P(␣)e I␣ ͚͞P(␣)͉ Where P(␣)mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The NS2, or nuclear export protein (NEP), consists of 121 amino acid residues [38]; it mediates the export of newly synthesized RNPs from the nucleus to the cytoplasm [39,40]. The NS2 protein interacts with the viral matrix protein (M1) and with cellular exportin, a family of cellular proteins that mediate nuclear export [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%