2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.01.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of carbon nanotubes at the interface in blends of polyamide and ethylene–acrylate copolymer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
142
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
142
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preferential localization of conductive filler in one of the phases is commonly explained by the differences in interfacial energies of the filler and the corresponding polymer, which originates from the different polarities and surface energies. Some of the authors compared the predication of the wetting coefficient or equivalent equations that described the localization of fillers in blends to their experimental observations [22][23][24]. However, it was very difficult to get the interfacial tensions of polymer melt at the processing temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Preferential localization of conductive filler in one of the phases is commonly explained by the differences in interfacial energies of the filler and the corresponding polymer, which originates from the different polarities and surface energies. Some of the authors compared the predication of the wetting coefficient or equivalent equations that described the localization of fillers in blends to their experimental observations [22][23][24]. However, it was very difficult to get the interfacial tensions of polymer melt at the processing temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was very difficult to get the interfacial tensions of polymer melt at the processing temperature. The interfacial tensions of polymer at room temperature were used to predict the wetting coefficient [22,23,25], but sometimes results deviating from actual situation might be obtained. There are a few reports about CNT/PVDF composites prepared by double percolation concept [23,26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,[32][33][34][35] The surface energies of ITO, pDPP5T-2, PCBM, Phen-NaDPO, pDPP5T-2:PCBM and pDPP5T-2:PCBM:Phen-NaDPO were determined by measuring the droplet's contact angle for three liquids (ultrapure water, diiodomethane and ethylene glycol) using the Owens-Wendt and Kaelble method (Fig. 3a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical coating of the CNT by selective adsorption is a preferable strategy for several reasons: first, it preserves all intrinsic features of the nanotubes; second, it provides efficient surface modification with ease and cost effectiveness; third, it is potentially reversible, which can be of importance to reduce contact resistance between the CNT. The effectiveness of this selective adsorption strategy for improved CNT dispersion or phase/interfacial selectivity has been demonstrated by our research team for acrylateethylene copolymers, polyamides, and polyethylene already [37,[41][42][43]. One key result of these studies is that the melting sequence of the polymers plays an important role for the final dispersion and morphology: the first polymer to contact the nanotubes during melting has the opportunity to strongly adsorb by noncovalent interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%