2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2009.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of radiolabeled anti-CEA antibody in subcutaneous and intrahepatic colorectal xenografts: influence of tumor size and location within host organ on antibody uptake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observations of another antibody, A33, in a well-differentiated model also showed early uptake around blood vessels resulting in homogeneous tumor uptake by 48 h after injection (15). Anti-CEA antibodies had penetrated well-vascularized intrahepatic xenografts effectively at 24 h after injection (18)(19)(20), which is more in agreement with our results, compared with subcutaneous tumors of the same cell line (17,32). Lower-affinity antibodies (e.g., anti-HER2) penetrate tumors more efficiently (9), and modeling predicts that binding-site barrier effects are unlikely for mAbs with a K d greater than 1 nM (33), such as BR96 (K d 5 4 nM).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Observations of another antibody, A33, in a well-differentiated model also showed early uptake around blood vessels resulting in homogeneous tumor uptake by 48 h after injection (15). Anti-CEA antibodies had penetrated well-vascularized intrahepatic xenografts effectively at 24 h after injection (18)(19)(20), which is more in agreement with our results, compared with subcutaneous tumors of the same cell line (17,32). Lower-affinity antibodies (e.g., anti-HER2) penetrate tumors more efficiently (9), and modeling predicts that binding-site barrier effects are unlikely for mAbs with a K d greater than 1 nM (33), such as BR96 (K d 5 4 nM).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Although the methods of analysis differ, differences in antigen expression, vascularization, and immune response between the animals used are also likely to have been a factor (17). The increased variance in tumor activity uptake after 48 h after injection was attributed to variations in tumor growth or reduction, as has been observed elsewhere (19). The new cell populations present in several tumors had little activity uptake, probably because of a lower antibody concentration in the blood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Briefly, 2 · 10 6 cells were injected into the spleen, followed by a splenectomy after 10 min (21,22). Hepatic tumor growth was monitored by bioluminescence imaging using the IVIS system (Xenogen/Caliper Life Sciences) as previously described (23).…”
Section: Cell Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%