Localization of social science research in selected academic disciplines in South Korea

Abstract

Social science contributes to social development when theory and research topic are linked to its social context. However, in practice most social scientists in South Korea tend to explain their social issues and problems through mainstream theoretical perspectives that were primarily developed in the West. This study investigates how much social science research is localized in four selected social science disciplines (sociology, political science, public administration, and education) in South Korea. The study analyzes articles published in one representative domestic journal in each discipline to assess the localization of knowledge production during the last three decades (1988–2017). It was found that the local knowledge-base of Korean social science research is relatively weak though it has been continuously increasing during the last three decades. It was also found that knowledge production in social sciences is reliant on Western theory even though the research topics are locally embedded. In addition, the findings revealed that there are noticeable differences between the applied fields (public administration and education) and the pure fields (sociology and political science). Applied fields of public administration and education are more locally embedded than pure fields of sociology and political science. This study proposes that social science research in South Korea should draw more on indigenous knowledge and be less reliant on Western theory in the future.

Why do some academic articles receive more citations from policy communities?

“…For instance, Linkov et al (2021) developed a Linguistic Diversity Index to promote citations from articles published in less commonly used languages. Additionally, researchers in China and Korea have explored the integration of Western academic works by scholars publishing in their native languages (Gong et al, 2019;Ma, 2024;Shin et al, 2021).…”

Advancing the understanding of the flipped classroom approach with students' perceptions of the learning environment: variation between academic disciplines

“…Specifically, we adopt Biglan's (1973) model to classify academic disciplines. His work has received continuous interest (e.g., Becher, 1994;Jones, 2011;Lam et al, 2014;Fedi et al, 2021;Salto, 2021;Shin et al, 2021). Scholars usually adopt his model to classify the academic disciplines as any combination of soft versus hard, pure versus applied, and life versus and pure versus applied (how much the subject knowledge is practical), are more relevant to the teaching pedagogies and instruction method because of their close relations with the core of the subject knowledge.…”

Neutral, Non-Disruptive, and Native: Why Do Chinese Nonprofit Scholars Cite English Articles?

“…For example, Linkov et al (2021) created a Linguistic Diversity Index to encourage citing articles in less widely used languages. Chinese and Korean scholars have studied how Western literature is used by scholars who publish in their respective languages (Gong et al, 2019; Shin et al, 2021).…”