1992
DOI: 10.1159/000133198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of the pig luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor gene (LHCGR) by radioactive and nonradioactive in situ hybridization

Abstract: The porcine gene for luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) was localized to chromosome 3q2.2→q2.3 using radioactive and nonradioactive in situ hybridization. A computer-assisted image-analysis system was developed which facilitated detection of the position of silver grains and fluorescent spots on the chromosomes after in situ hybridization. Compared with autoradiographic visualization, the nonisotopic procedure proved to be more rapid, precise, and highly specific; however, nonradiographic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Slides were rcstained with Giemsa, and all chromosomes in preselected metaphases that were associat ed with a silver grain were identified. The relative positions of the grains associated with a chromosome were measured by using a computer-assisted image analysis system, as previously described (Yerle et al, 1992). The num ber oflabeled sites was automatically plotted for each chromosome, resulting in a histogram of the grain distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slides were rcstained with Giemsa, and all chromosomes in preselected metaphases that were associat ed with a silver grain were identified. The relative positions of the grains associated with a chromosome were measured by using a computer-assisted image analysis system, as previously described (Yerle et al, 1992). The num ber oflabeled sites was automatically plotted for each chromosome, resulting in a histogram of the grain distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Yerle et al (1992). 100 ng of cosrnid 3.1 were biotin labeled by random priming using biotin-16-dUTP (Boehringer Mannheim).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After in situ hybridization, the slides were res tained with Giemsa, and the preselected metaphases were compared with their appearance before hybridization to identify the chromosomes. The rela tive positions of the grains associated with a chromosome were measured by using a computer-assisted image analysis system, as previously described (Yerle et al" 1992). Statistical evaluation of the number of silver grains per unit chromosome length was performed assuming a Poisson distribution of the grains along the length of the chromosome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%