2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2016/02/023404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localized eigenvectors of the non-backtracking matrix

Abstract: Abstract. In the case of graph partitioning, the emergence of localized eigenvectors can cause the standard spectral method to fail. To overcome this problem, the spectral method using a non-backtracking matrix was proposed. Based on numerical experiments on several examples of real networks, it is clear that the non-backtracking matrix does not exhibit localization of eigenvectors. However, we show that localized eigenvectors of the non-backtracking matrix can exist outside the spectral band, which may lead t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Pastor-Satorras and Castellano [85] performed an extensive analytic and numerical investigation of the mathematical properties of the H-index, finding analytically that the H-index is expected to be strongly correlated with degree in uncorrelated networks. The same strong correlation is found also in real networks, and Pastor-Satorras and Castellano [85] point out that the H-index is a poor indicator of node spreading influence as compared to the non-backtracking centrality [102]. While the comparison of different metrics with respect to their ability to identify influential spreaders is not one of the main focus of the present review, we remind the interested reader to [48,85,87] for recent reports on this important problem.…”
Section: Coreness Centrality and Its Relation With Degree And H-indexsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Recently, Pastor-Satorras and Castellano [85] performed an extensive analytic and numerical investigation of the mathematical properties of the H-index, finding analytically that the H-index is expected to be strongly correlated with degree in uncorrelated networks. The same strong correlation is found also in real networks, and Pastor-Satorras and Castellano [85] point out that the H-index is a poor indicator of node spreading influence as compared to the non-backtracking centrality [102]. While the comparison of different metrics with respect to their ability to identify influential spreaders is not one of the main focus of the present review, we remind the interested reader to [48,85,87] for recent reports on this important problem.…”
Section: Coreness Centrality and Its Relation With Degree And H-indexsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…For the purpose of ranking nodes with an eigenvector-based centrality, localization can sometimes be problematic, because the centrality concentrates onto a (potentially very small) subset of the nodes, and this makes it difficult to reliably rank nodes outside of that subset. This has prompted the introduction and investigation of new centrality measures that, for example, do not exhibit localization (or at least exhibit less severe localization) due to the presence of nodes with large degree [68,86], although localization can still arise due to other network structures [98]. We also remark that the "non-backtracking centrality" (also called "Hashimoto centrality") introduced in Ref.…”
Section: Mgp: Pagerank Centralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These walks include at least one back-and-forth flip between a pair of nodes. One concrete justification for the use of nonbacktracking walks is that localization effects can sometimes be avoided [17,24,31]. In the context of community detection, a nonbacktracking version of spectral clustering was proposed in [20].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will use BTW and NBTW as shorthand for backtracking walk and nonbacktracking walk, respectively. We note that NBTWs have typically been studied on undirected networks [2,17,20,[24][25][26]32], but the definition continues to make sense in the directed case. We will denote by p r (A) the matrix whose (i, j)th entry counts the number of NBTWs of length r from node i to node j.…”
Section: Background and Problem Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%