2012
DOI: 10.17487/rfc6705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localized Routing for Proxy Mobile IPv6

Abstract: This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6705.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The request message is the Localized Routing Initialization (LRI) message in Figure 2 and belongs to the Initial phase of the localized routing. LMA1 and LMA2 respond to MAG1 using the Localized Routing Acknowledge message (LRA in Figure 2) in accordance with [RFC6705].…”
Section: Attribute Value Pair Used In This Documentmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The request message is the Localized Routing Initialization (LRI) message in Figure 2 and belongs to the Initial phase of the localized routing. LMA1 and LMA2 respond to MAG1 using the Localized Routing Acknowledge message (LRA in Figure 2) in accordance with [RFC6705].…”
Section: Attribute Value Pair Used In This Documentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In case of LRA_WAIT_TIME expiration [RFC6705], MAG1 should ask for authorization of localized routing again according to the procedure described above before the LRI is retransmitted up to a maximum of LRI_RETRIES. Figure 3 shows the second example scenario, in which LMA1 acts as a Diameter client, processing the data packet from MN2 to MN1 and requesting the authorization of localized routing.…”
Section: Attribute Value Pair Used In This Documentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mechanismus podpory mobility je dobře popsán v (Satrapa, 2011). Princip směrování v mobilních sítích s podporou IPv6 je specifikován v RFC 6705 (Krishnan et al, 2012b) a dále např. v RFC 7864 (Bernardos, 2016) nebo v RFC 6342 (Koodli, 2011.…”
Section: Podpora Mobilityunclassified