BACKGROUND Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for sebaceous carcinoma (SC) may reduce local recurrence rates, but published case series have small cohorts and limited follow-up. Mohs micrographic surgery is particularly suitable for sensitive functional and cosmetic locations, such as the face, because it facilitates tissue conservation using complete peripheral and deep margin assessment before reconstruction. Coordinated care between Mohs and oculoplastic surgeons has not been described. OBJECTIVE To assess rates of local recurrence and metastasis after MMS of facial SC and to describe coordinated care between Mohs and oculoplastic surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective review identified facial SC cases treated with MMS at a single institution from January 2005 to August 2020. Tumor characteristics and outcomes were recorded. Descriptive and predictive analyses were performed. RESULTS Forty-nine cases were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 51 months. The most common sites were periorbital, infraorbital cheek, and nasal ala. No patients experienced regional recurrence after MMS. One patient with Muir-Torre syndrome developed metastatic recurrence (at 82.9 months). All patients underwent 2-stage reconstruction with dermatology-performed MMS and oculoplastic reconstruction. CONCLUSION Collaboration between Mohs and oculoplastic surgeons with a tissue-sparing approach of MMS can reduce recurrence and optimize cosmesis and function for central facial SC.S ebaceous carcinoma (SC) is a rare malignant tumor that frequently affects the skin of the head and neck. 1 Compared with other locations, periorbital SC has an increased risk for regional metastasis and worse prognosis due to the potential for orbital invasion. 2-8 Surgical extirpation is the treatment of choice for SC and may be achieved through conventional excision or Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). Wide local excision (WLE) had been the historical treatment for sebaceous carcinoma. 4,5,[9][10][11][12] Although local recurrence rates have decreased, there is still much room for improvement.Compared with WLE, MMS of SC confirms clear margins before reconstruction and is particularly appealing in the treatment of SC because it allows for tissue conservation in cosmetically sensitive areas (e.g., eyelids and face) and may lower local recurrence rates. [13][14][15] However, despite MMS being associated with lower recurrence and metastatic rates, most studies of MMS for From the