2018
DOI: 10.1101/320523
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localizing and classifying adaptive targets with trend filtered regression

Abstract: Identifying genomic locations of natural selection from sequence data is an ongoing challenge in population genetics. Current methods utilizing information combined from several summary statistics typically assume no correlation of summary statistics regardless of the genomic location from which they are calculated. However, due to linkage disequilibrium, summary statistics calculated at nearby genomic positions are highly correlated. We introduce an approach termed Trendsetter that accounts for the similarity… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
5
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we briefly present its performance in terms of both classification of selective sweeps and in estimating parameters responsible for shaping sweeps. We compare classification performance of SURFDAWave to Trendsetter, as Trendsetter also models the spatial autocorrelation of summary statistics, and has already been extensively compared to other leading methods (Mughal and DeGiorgio, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Here we briefly present its performance in terms of both classification of selective sweeps and in estimating parameters responsible for shaping sweeps. We compare classification performance of SURFDAWave to Trendsetter, as Trendsetter also models the spatial autocorrelation of summary statistics, and has already been extensively compared to other leading methods (Mughal and DeGiorgio, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We initially compared SURFDAWave to Trendsetter, using the same set of summary statistics calculated from the same simulated datasets. Note that the set of summary statistics and number of windows used here is slightly different from what was originally employed by Trendsetter in Mughal and DeGiorgio (2019). However, we chose to focus on how the modeling of the summary statistics, rather than the number or choice of summary statistics, would affect differences in classification rates between SURFDAwave and Trendsetter.…”
Section: Classification Of Selective Sweepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations