2018
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msy205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localizing and Classifying Adaptive Targets with Trend Filtered Regression

Abstract: Identifying genomic locations of natural selection from sequence data is an ongoing challenge in population genetics. Current methods utilizing information combined from several summary statistics typically assume no correlation of summary statistics regardless of the genomic location from which they are calculated. However, due to linkage disequilibrium, summary statistics calculated at nearby genomic positions are highly correlated. We introduce an approach termed Trendsetter that accounts for the similarity… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(159 reference statements)
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we briefly present its performance in terms of both classification of selective sweeps and in estimating parameters responsible for shaping sweeps. We compare classification performance of SURFDAWave to Trendsetter [9], as Trendsetter also models the spatial autocorrelation of summary statistics, and we also provide a comprehensive comparison to two other leading sweep classifiers-evolBoosting [19] and diploS/HIC [6]. See Materials and methods for details on these comparisons, as well as important considerations regarding the alteration ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Here we briefly present its performance in terms of both classification of selective sweeps and in estimating parameters responsible for shaping sweeps. We compare classification performance of SURFDAWave to Trendsetter [9], as Trendsetter also models the spatial autocorrelation of summary statistics, and we also provide a comprehensive comparison to two other leading sweep classifiers-evolBoosting [19] and diploS/HIC [6]. See Materials and methods for details on these comparisons, as well as important considerations regarding the alteration ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This expectation is also motivated by results in ref. [9] comparing the classification accuracy of Trendsetter when using constant and linear trend-filtering functions, which respectively model curves with similar characteristics to the Haar and Dabechies' least-asymmetric wavelets employed by SURFDA-Wave. We find that the type of wavelets used as basis functions does not dramatically influence the overall classification rates (S3 Fig).…”
Section: Plos Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations