2018
DOI: 10.3790/soc.68.1.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localizing Global Climate Change in the Pacific. Knowledge and Response in Chuuk, Federated States of Micronesia (FSM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thinking with language in a literal sense, some studies have explored what is lost and found in translation when climate change is rendered in different languages. In many cultures and languages, the word climate (change) encompasses much more than atmospheric conditions, including elements of the social, spiritual and moral dimensions of human society (e.g., Friedrich, 2018; Hofmann, 2018). This raises questions of who translates what for whom—“what stories tell stories” (Haraway, 2019)—and draws attention to “more‐than‐human sociality” (Tsing, 2013).…”
Section: What Can We Learn From Reception Studies?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thinking with language in a literal sense, some studies have explored what is lost and found in translation when climate change is rendered in different languages. In many cultures and languages, the word climate (change) encompasses much more than atmospheric conditions, including elements of the social, spiritual and moral dimensions of human society (e.g., Friedrich, 2018; Hofmann, 2018). This raises questions of who translates what for whom—“what stories tell stories” (Haraway, 2019)—and draws attention to “more‐than‐human sociality” (Tsing, 2013).…”
Section: What Can We Learn From Reception Studies?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some Chuukese do not believe in climate science because the scientists do not believe in the Bible. Crucially, accepting and engaging with the science of climate change here seems to have more to do with trust in institutions than “faith in correctness” (Haines, 2019b; Hofmann, 2018, p. 54; Rayner et al, 2005; Rosengren, 2018, p. 608).…”
Section: What Can We Learn From Reception Studies?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anthropologists writing about these issues draw on prior discussion of “traveling models” (Behrends, Park, and Rottenburg 2014; Reyna 2007) to study the response of people living in the Pacific to global climate change as both a scientific discourse and a locally observed and experienced phenomenon (De Wit, Pascht, and Haug 2018b; Hoffman 2018; Klepp 2018; see also Bollig 2018; Weisser et al. 2013).…”
Section: A Critique Of “Traveling Models”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropologists writing about these issues draw on prior discussion of "traveling models" (Behrends, Park, and Rottenburg 2014;Reyna 2007) to study the response of people living in the Pacific to global climate change as both a scientific discourse and a locally observed and experienced phenomenon (De Wit, Pascht, and Haug 2018b;Hoffman 2018;Klepp 2018; see also Bollig 2018;Weisser et al 2013). The literature on traveling models and comparable processes of translation examines how ideas and practices associated with conflict resolution (Behrends, Park, and Rottenburg 2014), development (Bierschenk 2014;Olivier de Sardan 2018;Reyna 2007), and human rights (Merry 2006) move from the Global North to locations in the Global South.…”
Section: A Critique Of "Traveling Models"mentioning
confidence: 99%