The article analyzes the quality of (statistical) information support for monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and assesses the quality of their indicators. The author identifies the elements of the SDG data and its statistics, mainly indicators, data sources, data quality, disaggregation, exchange, monitoring and reporting. The Global edition of the Sustainable Development Report is considered, which allows to assess progress in achieving the SDGs, to analyze the positioning of countries in terms of the overall productivity rating and spillover score. The possibilities of an interactive dashboard to visualize the effectiveness of countries for each goal to determine further priorities are revealed. The author substantiates the interpretation of trends in the SDG indicators by the effectiveness of their achievement in accordance with the growth rate, the status of achieving the target values and the direction of dynamics. In order to assess the quality of the SDG data, the author compares the reports prepared by the Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN), the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the European Commission's statistical organization (Eurostat). It is found that the use of different methodologies and a set of indicators leads to different assessments of progress in implementing the SDGs, distortion of the results leading to unreasonable management decisions at the global, regional and national levels. Particular attention is paid to data gaps, blind spots in the dashboard, which lead to problems in adequately assessing the progress of countries in achieving the 2030 Agenda and sustainable development policies. It is proved that in the context of Ukraine's integration with the EU, it is important to develop and implement a national system of SDG targets and indicators. It is stated that this will be facilitated by the implementation of a UN project to compensate for the gap in international statistics, taking into account the serious consequences of the war in Ukraine on the SDGs. It is noted that the practice of disclosing business indicators of sustainable development and impact through open reporting is becoming a source of effective data collection, analysis, and exchange. The results of the study provide practical recommendations for improving statistical support to improve SDG monitoring through the use of unofficial data and alternative sources to fill in blind spots and information gaps.