2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of the currently available treatment options

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also reported pattern of safety and recurrence of stage III to IV head and neck cancer patients treated with RT with a daily dose of 2.12 grays (Gy) for 33 fractions . A more recent systematic review and Bayesian network meta‐analysis, including only LAHNC, confirmed the superiority of concurrent chemoradiotherapy compared to RT alone in terms of survival; moreover, altered fractionation resulted not superior to conventional RT in terms of progression‐free survival …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also reported pattern of safety and recurrence of stage III to IV head and neck cancer patients treated with RT with a daily dose of 2.12 grays (Gy) for 33 fractions . A more recent systematic review and Bayesian network meta‐analysis, including only LAHNC, confirmed the superiority of concurrent chemoradiotherapy compared to RT alone in terms of survival; moreover, altered fractionation resulted not superior to conventional RT in terms of progression‐free survival …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…12 A more recent systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis, including only LAHNC, confirmed the superiority of concurrent chemoradiotherapy compared to RT alone in terms of survival; moreover, altered fractionation resulted not superior to conventional RT in terms of progression-free survival. 13 In the present study, we aimed to analyze and compare two cohorts of LAHNC patients treated in the same institution with two schedules of hypofractionated RT, 33 fractions of 2.12 Gy each versus 30 fractions of 2.2 Gy each, and 5 versus 3 mm CTV (clinical target volume) to PTV (planning target volume) margins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with locally-advanced diseases, unresectable tumors, or patients at high risk, post-operation, are often treated with RT [ 9 ]. The concurrent administration of chemotherapy during the RT course has been reported to significantly improve overall, disease-specific, and disease-free survival rates [ 10 , 11 ]. Although the toxicity of combination modality therapy remains higher than that of chemotherapy, RT alone can also lead to significant oral complications and profoundly influence patients’ quality of life [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a radioenhancer, cetuximab provides survival benefit when combined with radiation, 35 and was once thought to have comparable but not increasing toxicities. 12 Although no infusion-associated death was reported in our patients, approximately half of them experienced SAEs with mostly dermatological-or mucosal-associated complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%