2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.12431
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locally elliptic actions, torsion groups, and nonpositively curved spaces

Abstract: Extending and unifying a number of well-known conjectures and open questions, we conjecture that locally elliptic actions (that is, every element has a bounded orbit) of finitely generated groups on finite dimensional nonpositively curved spaces have global fixed points. In particular, finitely generated torsion groups cannot act without fixed points on such spaces. We prove these conjectures for a wide class of spaces, including all infinite families of Euclidean buildings, Helly complexes, some graphical sma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As one might expect, the strongest consequences are to be had from the 1 model, but correspondingly it is the most restrictive. Conversely, the ∞ model is the most general, but the properties one can obtain are more limited (even though the related Helly graphs enjoy some stronger properties than CAT(0) spaces, leading for instance to biautomaticity [CCG + 20] and controlled torsion subgroups [HO21] for groups acting on them). The 2 model serves as a happy medium between these two extremes, but it suffers from a different problem: it is extremely difficult to determine whether a given space is CAT(0) without already possessing stronger information, such as the existence of a certain manifold structure or the possibility of using 1 methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one might expect, the strongest consequences are to be had from the 1 model, but correspondingly it is the most restrictive. Conversely, the ∞ model is the most general, but the properties one can obtain are more limited (even though the related Helly graphs enjoy some stronger properties than CAT(0) spaces, leading for instance to biautomaticity [CCG + 20] and controlled torsion subgroups [HO21] for groups acting on them). The 2 model serves as a happy medium between these two extremes, but it suffers from a different problem: it is extremely difficult to determine whether a given space is CAT(0) without already possessing stronger information, such as the existence of a certain manifold structure or the possibility of using 1 methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%