2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10827-014-0499-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locally optimal extracellular stimulation for chaotic desynchronization of neural populations

Abstract: We use optimal control theory to design a methodology to find locally optimal stimuli for desynchronization of a model of neurons with extracellular stimulation. This methodology yields stimuli which lead to positive Lyapunov exponents, and hence desynchronizes a neural population. We analyze this methodology in the presence of interneuron coupling to make predictions about the strength of stimulation required to overcome synchronizing effects of coupling. This methodology suggests a powerful alternative to pu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the case, for example, of important applications such as neural networks, where pathological synchronization among bursting neurons might be related to the tremors observed in patients affected by the Parkinson's disease [27]. Interestingly, the key idea behind Deep Brain Stimulation techniques is indeed that of perturbing the synchronization of neurons via noise, see e.g., [28]. We also remark here that Theorem 2 offers an insight on how the size of the network has an impact on effects of noise diffusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the case, for example, of important applications such as neural networks, where pathological synchronization among bursting neurons might be related to the tremors observed in patients affected by the Parkinson's disease [27]. Interestingly, the key idea behind Deep Brain Stimulation techniques is indeed that of perturbing the synchronization of neurons via noise, see e.g., [28]. We also remark here that Theorem 2 offers an insight on how the size of the network has an impact on effects of noise diffusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holt et al, 2016; D. Wilson & Moehlis, 2014). To address whether this mechanism could apply here, we investigated whether more phase slips, indicating discontinuities in the oscillation phase, were seen in the 15 ms following consecutive cycles of stimulation at the suppressing or amplifying phase (reported as a percentage of stimulus pulses) ( Fig.…”
Section: Figure 5 Consecutive Phase-consistent Stimulus Pulses Modulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advancements to DBS algorithms have been aimed at improving efficacy and reducing the amount of current delivered, which could limit stimulation-induced side effects and conserve battery power (Adamchic et al, 2014;Brocker et al, 2017;Cagnan et al, 2017;Little et al, 2013;D. Wilson & Moehlis, 2014).…”
Section: Implications For Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike other proposed methods in [106], [110], the procedure does not need the full model of the dynamics. Later, the methodology was moved closer towards experimentation (adapted for extracellular neural stimulation as is the case of DBS) in [111].…”
Section: G Control Of Neuronal Oscillator Network: Desychronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%