2011 International Conference on Computer Vision 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2011.6126411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locally rigid globally non-rigid surface registration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these algorithms, like RANSAC, require an a priori parametric model of the transformation whose parameters are computed using the correspondences, and thus, difficult to generalise to arbitrary deformations. Similar limitations are also shared by methods relying on implicit shape models [14], [24]. In the Gaussian Process framework we propose, we also progressively reduce the number of potential correspondences but, in contrast to previous approaches, no a priori parametric deformation model is required.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, these algorithms, like RANSAC, require an a priori parametric model of the transformation whose parameters are computed using the correspondences, and thus, difficult to generalise to arbitrary deformations. Similar limitations are also shared by methods relying on implicit shape models [14], [24]. In the Gaussian Process framework we propose, we also progressively reduce the number of potential correspondences but, in contrast to previous approaches, no a priori parametric deformation model is required.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, these algorithms, like RANSAC, require an a priori parametric model whose parameters are computed using the correspondences, and thus, cannot generalize to arbitrary deformations. Similar limitations are also shared by methods relying on implicit shape models [17,8]. In the Gaussian Process framework we propose, we also progressively reduce the number of potential correspondences but, in contrast to these previous approaches, no parametric deformation model is required.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The energy function is described by two terms: the data term E Data (W t−1 , S, T ) is a non-rigid ICP function (N-ICP), measuring the difference between the model and the live frame. As non-rigid registration in R 3 is an inherently ill-posed problem [14], an infinite number of solutions can be found, with no guarantee of consistency between frames. To address this issue, an As-Rigid-As-Possible (ARAP) [38] regularisation term E Reg (W t−1 , S) was introduced.…”
Section: Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%