2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2008.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locally scheduled packet bursting for data collection in wireless sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [8], problem of overloading is handled. When an event is detected, C-node (data collection point) is elected.…”
Section: Ensuring Fairnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], problem of overloading is handled. When an event is detected, C-node (data collection point) is elected.…”
Section: Ensuring Fairnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the new pair (L, B) is inserted into slot 3 because it cannot be scheduled before slot 3 (line [15][16][17]. Another node pair (E, A) is found and inserted into slot 3, concurrently scheduling with (L, B) (line [18][19][20][21]. Regarding another node, K wants to join, the related pair (K, A) is inserted into slot 1 because it is scheduled with (H, F) concurrently (line 10-14).…”
Section: Scheduling Strategy Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way any event may be reported by more than one sensor node due to the nature of these networks [12]. This phenomenon in turn increases the network congestion ratio, packet loss ratio and network energy consumption [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%