2012
DOI: 10.1142/s0219691312500348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locally Supported Wavelets for the Separation of Spherical Vector Fields With Respect to Their Sources

Abstract: We provide a space domain oriented separation of magnetic fields into parts generated by sources in the exterior and sources in the interior of a given sphere. The separation itself is well-known in geomagnetic modeling, usually in terms of a spherical harmonic analysis or a wavelet analysis that is spherical harmonic based. In contrast to these frequency oriented methods, we use a more spatially oriented approach in this paper. We derive integral representations with explicitly known convolution kernels. Regu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…L 2 (S) and H k (S) denote the corresponding scalar valued function spaces. For the rest of this section, we briefly recapitulate some notations and results from [2,3,6,[14][15][16][17]. In particular, proofs of the main results of this section, i.e.…”
Section: Auxiliary Results and Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L 2 (S) and H k (S) denote the corresponding scalar valued function spaces. For the rest of this section, we briefly recapitulate some notations and results from [2,3,6,[14][15][16][17]. In particular, proofs of the main results of this section, i.e.…”
Section: Auxiliary Results and Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to be able to obtain a spherical version of Theorem 1.4(c), we reformulate the decomposition of Theorem 2.1 in terms of a set of pseudo-differential operatorsõ (1) ,õ (2) ,õ (3) as indicated in [8,10,11,12]. More precisely, 12) where D denotes the pseudo-differential operator…”
Section: Operator Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By dω we denote the surface element on the sphere Ω R . The non-uniqueness of recovering a vertically integrated magnetization m from the knowledge of V in Ω ext R can be characterized by a fairly well-known decomposition (see, e.g., [1,8,11,12,13,18,19,22]) m =m (1) +m (2) +m (3) , (1.3) which has the property that V ≡ 0 in Ω ext R if and only ifm (2) ≡ 0 (in other words, any magnetization of the form m =m (1) +m (3) produces no magnetic potential in the exterior Ω ext R ). We call such a decomposition a Hardy-Hodge decomposition (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In geomagnetic applications they have been used in Freeden and Gerhards (2010) and Gerhards (2011aGerhards ( , 2012.…”
Section: Green's Function For the Beltrami Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spherical versions have already been introduced in Dahlke et al (1995), Schröder and Swelden (1995), Windheuser (1996), Holschneider (1996), and Freeden et al (1998). The application to geomagnetic problems, however, is rather recent (see, e.g., Bayer et al 2001;Holschneider et al 2003;Maier and Mayer 2003;Chambodut et al 2005;Mayer and Maier 2006;Freeden and Gerhards 2010;Gerhards 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%