1994
DOI: 10.1080/02815739408730364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locals, incomers and second homes—the role of resold public sector dwellings in rural Scotland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jones and Murie (2006: 143) have shown that resales offer good value for money within local housing markets, which attracted buyers from beyond the community, outbidding local residents. This occurred for instance in tourist areas where resales became second homes or retirement homes (Williams & Twine, 1994).…”
Section: Neighborhood Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jones and Murie (2006: 143) have shown that resales offer good value for money within local housing markets, which attracted buyers from beyond the community, outbidding local residents. This occurred for instance in tourist areas where resales became second homes or retirement homes (Williams & Twine, 1994).…”
Section: Neighborhood Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second strand of literature investigates the resales of former public sector dwellings (see Forrest et al 1995Forrest et al , 1996Williams and Twine 1994;Chaney and Sherwood 2000;Pawson and Watkins 1998a, b). Although this strand of literature is related to the topic of the present study, it approaches the subject from a different angle.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the discussions in parliament on the potential effect of the RTB on mobility, there has been no research investigating whether social renters became more mobile after buying their house. There have been a number of studies investigating the resales of former council dwellings (Forrest et al 1995(Forrest et al , 1996Williams and Twine 1994;Chaney and Sherwood 2000;Pawson and Watkins 1998a, b), but these studies focused on the characteristics of the buyers of these dwellings, while we are interested in the sellers (those who bought the dwelling from the social landlord under the RTB).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, where housing stock is readily available second homes may be welcomed as a significant means of economic development (Hjalager, Staunstrup, & Ibsen, 2011;Hoogendoorn & Visser, 2010;Velvin, Kvikstad, Drag, & Krogh, 2013) and property price maintenance. Indeed, a further, though relatively underexplored aspect of second homes is the interrelationships between housing, real estate and investment policies in general and second homes (Bhattacharya & Kim, 2011;Bianco, 2006;Jurinski, 2010;Norris, Paris, & Winston, 2010;Oliveira, Roca, & Roca, 2013;Visser, 2004), including second home development and purchase and its influence on housing affordability (Hadsell & Colarusso, 2009;Williams & Twine, 1994). Further complicating the understanding of the relationship between second homes, displacement and housing concerns are issues of definition as to what constitutes a second home (Czarnecki & Frenkel, 2014), and the difficulty in differentiating between second homes for leisure and recreation and as an investment mechanism (Huang & Yi, 2011;Hui & Yu, 2009;Norris & Winston, 2009).…”
Section: Planning and Policy Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%