“…Upon these exclusions, we were left with n = 4,513 after excluding non-credible answers, n = 4,140 after excluding twins, and n = 3,763 after excluding only children. Thus, for the present study, the total participant sample used at baseline At the 50 th year follow-up, of the 4,879 representative subsample targeted for data collection, the Project Talent team managed to locate 84.8%, of whom about 56% participated in the 50 th year follow-up (n = 1,952; see Stone et al, 2014). Due to the baseline sample exclusions described above as well as missing data on key outcome variables, our longitudinal sample (using listwise deletion across all study variables) consisted of 1,196 people (52.5% female, 90.4% White/Caucasian, 37% firstborn, Mage = 67.66, SDage = 1.23), though longitudinal samples differed depending on the specific outcome variable, because cases with missing values were non-overlapping (ns = 1,259 to 1,511).…”