2001
DOI: 10.1021/bi010391+
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locating Monovalent Cations in the Grooves of B-DNA,

Abstract: Here we demonstrate that monovalent cations can localize around B-DNA in geometrically regular, sequence-specific sites in oligonucleotide crystals. Positions of monovalent ions were determined from high-resolution X-ray diffraction of DNA crystals grown in the presence of thallium(I) cations (Tl(+)). Tl(+) has previously been shown to be a useful K(+) mimic. Tl(+) positions determined by refinement of model to data are consistent with positions determined using isomorphous F(Tl) - F(K) difference Fouriers and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
208
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
20
208
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although extensive further theoretical and experimental work is required before firm conclusions can be formed, one observation presented above helps to discriminate among models proposed thus far: we find that the rate and extent of pairing increases progressively with temperature up to 40°C and then decreases. In general, indirect pairing models depend on the matching of the conformations of two nearby dsDNA molecules, and it has been predicted that conformationbased models [e.g., including sequence-dependent binding of ions (41,42)] should exhibit exactly the pattern of temperature dependence that we observe. At low temperatures, homologous molecules may get frozen in nonmatching conformations that do not result in a strong attraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Although extensive further theoretical and experimental work is required before firm conclusions can be formed, one observation presented above helps to discriminate among models proposed thus far: we find that the rate and extent of pairing increases progressively with temperature up to 40°C and then decreases. In general, indirect pairing models depend on the matching of the conformations of two nearby dsDNA molecules, and it has been predicted that conformationbased models [e.g., including sequence-dependent binding of ions (41,42)] should exhibit exactly the pattern of temperature dependence that we observe. At low temperatures, homologous molecules may get frozen in nonmatching conformations that do not result in a strong attraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The self-complementary Drew-Dickerson dodecamer (DDD) (Figure 9), has been crystallized in the presence of Tl + (65). The locations of monovalent and divalent cations are depicted in Figure 7.…”
Section: Electrostatic Binding Of Cations To Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structures emergent from molecular dynamics calculations in which the amino group was constrained to be proximate to O 6 -position at G 10 , on the floor of the major groove, were consistent with experimental NOE's, and indicated the possibility of axial bending (Figure 12). The interpretation of the data that emerged from electrostatic footprinting (90,91) and NMR (105) studies posited that, as a consequence of favorable electrostatic interactions, the tethered amine occupied conformational space in the vicinity of O 6 and N7 of G 10 , inducing DNA bending, and enabling the release of a diffusible cation(s) from a high-affinity major groove cation binding site associated with the CGCG tracts of the DDD (65). Indeed, as mentioned above, the preferential binding of monovalent cations within the major groove in CGCG has been substantiated by crystallographic analysis in the presence of Tl + (Figure 7) (65).…”
Section: Structural Studies On Dna With Tethered Cationic Sidechainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since GC-rich sequences preferentially localize cations in the major groove (111)(112)(113)(114)(115)(116)(117) and undergo the B-to Α-form structural transition relatively easily (118)(119)(120)(121)(122), and Α-tract DNAs preferentially bind cations in the minor groove (57,58,107,109,(123)(124)(125) and have the relatively rigid B'-DNA structure (40, 41), Hud and coworkers (110) have proposed that DNA conformation is determined by the relative proportion of counterions preferentially localized in the major and minor grooves of GC-rich and Α-tract sequences, respectively. While much experimental data can be correlated by this hypothesis, it is possible that the ionophore concept may be more applicable to DNA and RNA structures that require counterion binding for stability.…”
Section: The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%