2015
DOI: 10.1080/13596748.2015.993875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locating post-16 professionalism: public spaces as dissenting spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When FE colleges engage in ethical action, they become public spaces, spaces of ‘friendship without intimacy’ (Arendt, 1958: 243), within which college leaders, teachers, employers, parents, politicians and students appear before each other in their natality and plurality. This image of the FE college as a public space (Dennis, 2015) is consistent with Hodgson and Spours’ (2015) notion of the post-incorporation college as a regional economic and vocational hub. This is a space of interdependence and unpredictability in which leadership and followership dissolve as distinct categories, all participants are both leaders and followers.…”
Section: Conclusion: Opening Possibilitiessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…When FE colleges engage in ethical action, they become public spaces, spaces of ‘friendship without intimacy’ (Arendt, 1958: 243), within which college leaders, teachers, employers, parents, politicians and students appear before each other in their natality and plurality. This image of the FE college as a public space (Dennis, 2015) is consistent with Hodgson and Spours’ (2015) notion of the post-incorporation college as a regional economic and vocational hub. This is a space of interdependence and unpredictability in which leadership and followership dissolve as distinct categories, all participants are both leaders and followers.…”
Section: Conclusion: Opening Possibilitiessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…One of the major issues of professionalism surrounded the non-compulsion to hold a teaching qualification. A report by the Further Education Funding Council in 1999 [44] indicated that only 59% of tutors in FE had a full level 4 teaching qualification. Dennis [44] notes the attempt to professionalise the sector with lecturers needing to have Qualified Teacher in Learning and Skills (QTLS) status coupled with membership of the IfL.…”
Section: Teaching Qualifications and Professional Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A report by the Further Education Funding Council in 1999 [44] indicated that only 59% of tutors in FE had a full level 4 teaching qualification. Dennis [44] notes the attempt to professionalise the sector with lecturers needing to have Qualified Teacher in Learning and Skills (QTLS) status coupled with membership of the IfL. This attempted to give priority with the status held by qualified teachers who were required to have QTS (qualified teacher status) and were regulated as members of the General Teaching Council (GTC).…”
Section: Teaching Qualifications and Professional Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%