2007
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2007)133:4(372)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locating Satellite Booster Disinfectant Stations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is important to consider the water quality implications of modifying distribution infrastructure. Previous work considered the placement of chlorine boosters stations (Ayvaz and Kentel 2015;Behzadian et al 2012;Boccelli et al 1998;Lansey et al 2007;Ohar and Ostfeld 2014;Prasad et al 2004;Tryby et al 2002Tryby et al , 1999 and water quality sensors (Berry et al 2006(Berry et al , 2009Hart and Murray 2010) within distribution systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it is important to consider the water quality implications of modifying distribution infrastructure. Previous work considered the placement of chlorine boosters stations (Ayvaz and Kentel 2015;Behzadian et al 2012;Boccelli et al 1998;Lansey et al 2007;Ohar and Ostfeld 2014;Prasad et al 2004;Tryby et al 2002Tryby et al , 1999 and water quality sensors (Berry et al 2006(Berry et al , 2009Hart and Murray 2010) within distribution systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been extensive research in WDS planning models over the last 30 years using physically-based simulation models (Loucks et al 2005;Mays 2000), numerically-based optimization models (Biegler and Grossmann 2004;Grossmann and Biegler 2004;Liebman 1976;Loucks et al 2005;Revelle et al 2004), and combinations of the two (Goulter 1992;Grayman 2006;Maier et al 2014;Razavi et al 2012a;Shamir 1983). The purpose of these models ranges from the selection of water sources to design and placement of treatment choices for new (Kang and Lansey 2012;Newman et al 2014) and modified (Boccelli et al 1998;Lansey et al 2007;Tryby et al 2002) water systems. Because centralized treatment and distributed delivery is the standard model for design and engineering of drinking water systems (Gleick 2003;Sharma et al 2010), planning models usually evaluate a diverse range of treatment approaches, but simplify or exclude the distribution system effects associated with those alternatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Optimization of the water distribution network started with considering the physical characteristics of the hydraulic compo-nents [6], followed by operational characteristics [7] and combination of these [8]. After water quality concern integrated [9], the problem has been investigated by numerous researches by introducing operation types of booster disinfection facilities [10] and with different solution methods [2,4,[11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2), the nodal concentrations for each consumer node ir and monitoring time tr, C ir,tr (M/L 3 ) is limited between the lower bound, C, and the upper bound, C . The term b i;j ir;tr in the expression of C ir,tr is corresponding to the response coefficient: [12]. By applying this principle, the time varying systems hydraulics and chlorine dosages, were illustrated as a linear system [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%