2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locating the BACE of the Cambrian: Bayan Gol in southwestern Mongolia and global correlation of the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 200 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…536 Ma (updated after Bowyer et al 2023b;Nelson et al 2023), and overlaps in time with cloudinids of the Nama assemblage (e.g. Topper et al 2022).…”
Section: Redefinition Of the Nama Assemblagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…536 Ma (updated after Bowyer et al 2023b;Nelson et al 2023), and overlaps in time with cloudinids of the Nama assemblage (e.g. Topper et al 2022).…”
Section: Redefinition Of the Nama Assemblagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent discoveries of typical Cambrian SSFs (e.g., Anabarites, Rugatotheca) in the siliceous rocks of the Daibu Member in the Xiaotan Section of Yongshan County from northeast Yunnan, indicate that it may be better correlated with the lower Kuanchuanpu Formation in south Shaanxi and the lower Maidiping Formation in south Sichuan (Yang et al, 2014(Yang et al, , 2016Steiner et al, 2020;Yang and Steiner., 2021). Therefore, the base of siliceous strata of the basal Daibu Member has commonly been taken as the base of Cambrian at least in China (Yang and Steiner., 2021;Topper et al, 2022).…”
Section: Geological Background Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Meishucun Section in Jinning County of Kunming, eastern Yunnan of Southwest China was originally a candidate for the stratotype section for the international Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary in China. The exact location of the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary in eastern Yunnan however, is not fully resolved, despite much discussion (e.g., Peng, 2008;Geyer, 2019;Zhu et al, 2019Zhu et al, , 2021Bowyer et al, 2022;Topper et al, 2022). In general, "marker A" in the Meishucun Section, as defined by the first appearance datum of Small Shelly Fossils (SSFs), is most commonly regarded as the base of Cambrian in China (Qian et al, 2002;Zhu et al, 2001Zhu et al, , 2003, and this is also supported by a recent U-Pb Zircon age (Zhu et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, tectonic models need better paleontological underpinning. The Neoproterozoic–lower Cambrian successions and faunas of the Zavkhan terrane are relatively well studied (e.g., Voronin et al, 1982; Wood et al, 1993; Brasier et al, 1996; Smith et al, 2016; Yang et al, 2020; Steiner et al, 2021; Topper et al, 2022). In contrast, our knowledge of facies and fossils from other former tectonic zones is still almost in its infancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%