2018
DOI: 10.1111/pbr.12655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locating two novel genes for resistance to powdery mildew from Avena byzantina in the oat genome

Abstract: Powdery mildew of oats is a major threat to intensive oat farming under humid climate, and the use of resistant cultivars is the most environmentally friendly way of achieving safe yields. In this study, the genetic mapping of unexplored resistance genes from Avena byzantina accessions AVE2406 and AVE2925, designated Pm9 and Pm10, is described. Both accessions were crossed with susceptible cultivars, and monogenic segregation was established based on detached leaf segment tests.The two recombinant inbred line … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the diversity panel, genomic DNA was extracted from lyophilized primary wheat leaves as described by Plaschke et al (1995). For 53 oats of the collection, the Pm3 and other Pm phenotypes were known from previous studies (Hsam et al 1997(Hsam et al , 2014Yu and Herrmann 2006;Herrmann and Mohler 2018). The pedigrees of the oat lines carrying Pm3 (Table S2) were accessed from the POOL database (Tinker and Deyl 2005; https:// triti ceaet oolbox.…”
Section: Plant Materials and Dna Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the diversity panel, genomic DNA was extracted from lyophilized primary wheat leaves as described by Plaschke et al (1995). For 53 oats of the collection, the Pm3 and other Pm phenotypes were known from previous studies (Hsam et al 1997(Hsam et al , 2014Yu and Herrmann 2006;Herrmann and Mohler 2018). The pedigrees of the oat lines carrying Pm3 (Table S2) were accessed from the POOL database (Tinker and Deyl 2005; https:// triti ceaet oolbox.…”
Section: Plant Materials and Dna Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven major genes for resistance to powdery mildew in cultivated oats have been catalogued so far (Pm1-Pm11; Hsam et al 2014;Herrmann and Mohler 2018;Ociepa et al 2020), but many more sources, as yet uncharacterized, for resistance to powdery mildew do exist in oat landraces and wild relatives of different ploidy levels (Herrmann and Roderick 1996;Okoń et al 2014Okoń et al , 2016Okoń et al , 2018Okoń and Kowalczyk 2020). Although the access to genes from lower ploidy levels for enhancing cultivated oat germplasm is challenging (e.g., Aung et al 1977Aung et al , 2010Thomas et al 1980), agriculture will finally benefit from this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So far, 11 resistance genes to powdery mildew have been identified in oat. These genes were introduced into the cultivars from A. sterilis L. ( Pm1, Pm3, Pm8 and Pm11 ), A. byzantina L. ( Pm6, Pm9, Pm10) A. hirula L. ( Pm2 ), A. barbata L. ( Pm4 ), A. macrostachya L. ( Pm5 ) and A. eriantha L. ( Pm7 ) [ 5 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]. However, none of the described resistance genes are derived from A. fatua ; therefore, in the present study we attempted to determine whether A. fatua could be used as a source of effective resistance genes against powdery mildew in oat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of crop cultivars that contain effective resistance genes is the most effective and environmentally friendly method of infection control ( Okoń et al, 2016 ). To date, 11 powdery mildew resistance genes have been identified and characterized in oat ( Herrmann and Mohler, 2018 ; Hsam et al, 2014 ; Ociepa et al, 2020 ). The relationship between the host and powdery mildew is closely related to the “gene-for-gene” hypothesis, which says that a virulence gene ( Avr ) in the pathogen’s genome is directed against a resistance ( R ) gene in the plant ( Flor, 1971 ; Heath, 2000 ; Okoń and Ociepa, 2017 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%