2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locating what comes to mind in empirically derived representational spaces

Tracey Mills,
Jonathan Phillips
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research using process-tracing techniques suggests that how samples come to mind and what the task at hand is are largely independent. For example, Mills and Phillips [ 46 ] ask their participants to generate a list of animals as they come to mind, and find that doing so with no other purpose, or in order to answer a specific question, does not change the types of items participants produce. Similarly, Hardisty, Johnson and Weber [ 47 ] find that reporting ideas that come to mind while making a decision makes no qualitative difference on the resulting choice, compared to a condition without thought listing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research using process-tracing techniques suggests that how samples come to mind and what the task at hand is are largely independent. For example, Mills and Phillips [ 46 ] ask their participants to generate a list of animals as they come to mind, and find that doing so with no other purpose, or in order to answer a specific question, does not change the types of items participants produce. Similarly, Hardisty, Johnson and Weber [ 47 ] find that reporting ideas that come to mind while making a decision makes no qualitative difference on the resulting choice, compared to a condition without thought listing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond examining emotion fluency variables themselves, here we borrowed from the cognitive literature (Sauzéon et al, 2004;Zemla & Austerweil;Mills & Phillips 2023) and tested whether analyzing the order in which participants thought of emotion words could reveal the dimensions underlying emotion word representation. We hypothesized that dimensions of the circumplex model would structure word order (e.g., people would move along the dimensions of valence, arousal, and dominance as they search semantic space for emotion words; Russell & Mehrabian;1977;Russell et al, 1980;Posner et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond these questions regarding the development of emotion fluency and valence bias, emotion fluency tasks offer an opportunity to identify what dimensions structure the order in which emotion words spontaneously come to mind. Studies in cognitive psychology have shown that people produce words in fluency tasks by moving through semantic networks (Mills & Phillips, 2023;Sauzéon et al, 2004). Participant responses on memory retrieval and verbal fluency tasks often "cluster" around semantically related words.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%