2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2007.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Location and coordination of promoter atoms in Co- and Ni-promoted MoS2-based hydrotreating catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

27
358
3
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 455 publications
(393 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
27
358
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This preferential location of Co is also supported by other DFT simulations [26] and scanning tunnel microscopy (STM) experiments on gold supported CoMoS [27]. This latter cutting edge technique brought also numerous insights consistent with DFT approaches on the local structures of the active phases [28].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This preferential location of Co is also supported by other DFT simulations [26] and scanning tunnel microscopy (STM) experiments on gold supported CoMoS [27]. This latter cutting edge technique brought also numerous insights consistent with DFT approaches on the local structures of the active phases [28].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This point will be analyzed in details in the paper by K. Marchand et al published in the present volume [82]. Recent STM experiments have also revealed the presence of mixed Ni-Mo sites on the edges of NiMoS nano-crystallites [28], whereas such a situation has not been observed for CoMoS [65]. There is thus a striking agreement between the DFT calculations and STM experiments, which both reveal that Co prefers to be located at the S-edge, whereas Ni is present on both S-and M-edge.…”
Section: Nano-crystallite Morphologiesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Nowadays, the most widely accepted model for the structure of promoted HDS catalysts is the model developed by Topsøe [25]. It was reported that Co substitutes Mo atoms at the S edge creating a tetrahedral environment of Co (Co-Mo-S edge) [26], and it was shown for CoMoS phases that a S atom having bonds to Mo and Co is less strong bound than a S atom with bonds to two Mo atoms and therefore such a S atoms can be removed easily creating a vacancy [25]. The presence of Co located on the MoS 2 slabs confirmed by EDS analyses (see HRTEM) indicates the formation of the CoMoS phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…* cesar.gonzalez.pascual@gmail.com Different kinds of defects can be produced during the growth process [24], leading to a change in the electronic, magnetic, or optical properties [22,[25][26][27]. The defects can be classified into three types: point defects (such as vacancies or antisites), grain boundaries, and external borders of the compound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%