2009
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2009.5307474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Location- and delay-aware cross-layer communication in V2I multihop vehicular networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation key parameters are summarized in Table II. The selection of these simulation parameters is based on the studies [83,84,85,71]. This is because these studies were based on the realistic measurements between nearby vehicles.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation key parameters are summarized in Table II. The selection of these simulation parameters is based on the studies [83,84,85,71]. This is because these studies were based on the realistic measurements between nearby vehicles.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since RPL is designed with the intention of communicating with the infrastructure, proactive and reactive routing protocols which establish any node to any node path may seem an overkill. Location and delay-aware cross-layer protocol (LD-CROP) [14] is a V2I multihop routing protocol. It uses beacons, originating from the AP, to establish path information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the simulation area 2400x2400 m 2 with maximum travelling speed of 60 km/hr., the number of vehicles travelling on the roads ranges 50-200, the data packet size is 1000 bytes and data rate is 2 Mb/s [31,32]. In this scenario all vehicles are communicating with transmission range of 250 meters (24.50 dBm).…”
Section: Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In order to model the channel as lossy channel we use log-normal shadow fading. Shadowing effect states that at any given distance is the distance between transmitter and receiver from a transmitter, the path loss PL d at particular location is random and distributed log-normally about the mean distance-dependent value [31]. Therefore, path loss at meter from the transmitter is modeled as follows:…”
Section: Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%