2010
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201001-0057oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Location and Duration of Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Exacerbations Do Not Affect Outcomes

Abstract: Rationale: Individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) are subject to recurrent respiratory infections (exacerbations) that often require intravenous antibiotic treatment and may result in permanent loss of lung function. The optimal means of delivering therapy remains unclear. Objectives: To determine whether duration or venue of intravenous antibiotic administration affect lung function. Conclusions: Intravenous antibiotic therapy for CF respiratory exacerbations administered in the hospital and in the home was fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
92
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
92
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The study found that, despite longer duration of treatment, complete recovery of lost FEV1 did not happen with the extension of treatment. 15 The same study also did not show difference in FEV1 recovery according to the site of treatment (see below). Unlike our study, subjective parameters such as quality of life measures were not assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The study found that, despite longer duration of treatment, complete recovery of lost FEV1 did not happen with the extension of treatment. 15 The same study also did not show difference in FEV1 recovery according to the site of treatment (see below). Unlike our study, subjective parameters such as quality of life measures were not assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…antibiotics used to treat a pulmonary exacerbation. In contrast to studies where FEV1 was used as the primary outcome, which consistently showed a positive treatment effect [23][24][25][26], studies using LCI as an outcome measure have yielded heterogeneous results [13,[27][28][29][30]. The reasons why this is the case when LCI is used as the primary outcome measure are not well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…antibiotics occurs in the first week of treatment, with little additional benefit being achieved by extending treatment beyond this point [14,15]. Unfortunately, these studies did not assess the relationship between clinical improvement and microbiological response and their findings have not been considered sufficiently robust to change clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%