Location of implant‐retained fixed dentures affects oral health‐related quality of life

Maoko, Hara; Matsumoto, Takashi; Yokoyama, Sawako; Higuchi, Daisuke; Baba, Kazuyoshi

doi:10.1111/cid.12497

Cited by 9 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, we cannot reliably ascribe the level of OHRQoL to the treatment performed years ago, since we have no such data either before or soon after the prosthetic rehabilitation, and therefore, cannot estimate the influence the effect of response shift on the study outcomes. Previous reports show a significant influence of implantretained prosthetic treatment on OHRQoL, but these reports are based on before-and-after registrations [47].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient experience following iliac crest-derived alveolar bone grafting and implant placement

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The objective of this study was to assess patient-reported outcomes such as satisfaction and quality of life after advanced alveolar bone augmentation with anterior iliac crest grafting and implant treatment in orally compromised patients. Methods: This cross-sectional retrospective cohort study included 59 patients (29 women and 30 men) with major functional problems, who underwent advanced alveolar augmentation with autologous iliac bone grafts during a 10-year period (2002-2012). The self-administered questionnaire included 36 validated questions related to (1) demographics, (2) perceived general and oral health, (3) donor site and hospitalization, (4) status of implants and/or prosthesis, and (5) oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Results: Questionnaires were completed by 44 patients: 24 women and 20 men (response rate, 74.6%). Most patients reported good tolerance of the operative iliac bone harvesting (85%) and implant (90%) procedures. Postoperative pain at the donor site was reported by 38%, lasting 18.1 ± 16.1 days. An average of 4.3 ± 3.5 days of hospitalization and 20.2 ± 18.5 days of sick leave was reported. The overall satisfaction with prosthetic reconstruction was 90.5%. OHRQoL was reported with a mean Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) score of 8.4. Conclusion: Favorable OHRQoL and satisfaction were reported after advanced reconstruction of alveolar ridges with iliac crest-derived grafting and implants in severely compromised patients. However, this treatment requires substantial resources including hospitalization and sick leave.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient experience following iliac crest-derived alveolar bone grafting and implant placement

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The OHIP was also used by Yu et al, 11 which showed a change in overall QoL values from 23.1 to 4.9 with an effect size of 1.75. The Hara et al 16 OHIP scores decreased from 50.9 before treatment to 25.9 after the restoration resulting in an effect size of 1.03. Sghaireen et al 17 on the other hand, with their DIDL questionnaire reported a total satisfaction change of 0.088 to 0.469, pre‐ and post‐treatment, respectively, with 0.83 being the effect size.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…Sghaireen et al 17 showed a positive change in the mean DIDL esthetic scores from 0.015 to 0.141, with an effect size of 0.90. Hara et al 16 showed a positive change in the mean OHIP esthetic score from 10.4 to 4.9, with an effect size of 1.07. The greatest effect size change in the esthetic area was reported by Chen et al, 18 with an effect size change of 1.77 (Table 4).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Cumulatively, the PE's of the four studies, which showed an improvement in OHRQoL, was higher than the two studies which showed a decline. Along with the PEs, even the effect sizes of these two studies 18,19 are as a whole lesser than the total effect sizes of the remaining four studies 11,15‐17 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…A summary of the overall QoL results for group A are depicted in Table 3. Out of the group A studies the ones by Bramanti et al, 15 Yu et al, 11 and Hara et al 16 used a common OHRQoL index which is the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). Sghaireen et al 17 used the Dental Impact on Daily Living (DIDL), Chen et al 18 utilized the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ), and Andrade de Lima et al 19 reported their results using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Patient satisfaction with esthetics, phonetics, and function following implant‐supported fixed restorative treatment in the esthetic zone: A systematic review

Ramani

Bennani

Aarts

et al. 2020

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To determine patient satisfaction with esthetics, phonetics, and function following implant-supported fixed restorative treatment in the esthetic zone by measuring the Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL). Materials and methods: This systematic review follows the "Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols" (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Studies were searched in the databases Ovid, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The quality of the studies included in the review was scored using the GRADE system. The impact of the findings was analyzed by calculating effect size and standardization of results across different OHRQoL measurements was achieved by calculating the percentage equivalent. Results: A total of 13 studies were selected to be included in his systematic review after application of the inclusion criteria. A total of six studies recorded pre-and post-treatment OHRQoL results, while the remaining seven studies provided only post-treatment results. Conclusions: This review concluded that implant-supported fixed restorations in the esthetic zone have an overall positive impact on OHRQoL. However, patient satisfaction from this treatment reduced as the number of missing teeth replaced by implants was increased. Clinical significance: When implant-supported fixed restorations are being planned in the esthetic zone, dentists need to consider the patient's perception and the subsequent impact of these restorations on the patient's quality of life. Clinicians can be assured that patient OHRQoL will increase; however, clinicians should also keep in mind the importance of the gingival frame. Furthermore, they should be aware of the challenges when planning cases with larger numbers of implants in the esthetic zone as this could lead to a lowering of a patient QoL.

show abstract

Effect of treatment with implant-supported fixed partial dentures on oral health-related quality of life in patients with unilateral shortened dental arch

Watanabe,

Abe,

Kusumoto

et al. 2024

Journal of Dental Sciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Location of implant‐retained fixed dentures affects oral health‐related quality of life

Abstract: Our results suggest that the locations of dental implants influence OHRQoL impairments and improvements after treatment. This information might be useful in clinical decision-making.

Cited by 9 publications

References 26 publications

Patient experience following iliac crest-derived alveolar bone grafting and implant placement

Patient experience following iliac crest-derived alveolar bone grafting and implant placement

Patient satisfaction with esthetics, phonetics, and function following implant‐supported fixed restorative treatment in the esthetic zone: A systematic review

Effect of treatment with implant-supported fixed partial dentures on oral health-related quality of life in patients with unilateral shortened dental arch

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About