Location of International Classification of Diseases–11th Revision and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, dimensional trait models in the alternative five-factor personality space.

Aluja, Antón; Sayans-Jiménez, Pablo; Garcı́a, Luis F.; Gutiérrez, Fernando

doi:10.1037/per0000460

Cited by 15 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 64 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Note that Anankastia did not correlate with any other categorical PD, so it seems that this clinical usefulness came only from a slight increase in the prediction of Obsessive-Compulsive diagnosis. Given this limited clinical usefulness (as Carnovale et al, 2020, also reported), the high negative correlation with Disinhibition (of both the PID-5-SF and the PiCD), and the large loadings (with the opposite sign) of the Disinhibition and Anankastia domains on the same factor in both factor analyses, the present article supports the redefinition of Anankastia as the opposite pole of the Desinhibition domain (Carnovale et al, 2020;McCabe & Widiger, 2020), although to reach a final conclusion more research will be necessary on the Table 5 b Anankastia domain to explore its clinical correlates and discriminant validity (Aluja et al, 2020).…”

Section: And Mccabe Andsupporting

confidence: 68%

See 1 more Smart Citation

High convergent validity among the five-factor model, PID-5-SF, and PiCD.

García¹,

Aluja²,

Urieta³

et al. 2022

Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last 10 years, 2 instruments (the Personality Inventory for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition [PID-5] and the Personality Inventory for International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision [PiCD]) have been developed to measure the dimensional approach to personality disorders (PDs). Several studies have analyzed the relationships between both instruments and the five-factor model, although the PiCD has received less attention than the PID-5, given its more recent publication. For instance, the PiCD has never been related to the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). The aims of the present article were to explore the convergent validity of the NEO-PI-R, a short version of the PID-5 (PID-5-SF), and the PiCD, to compare these dimensional approaches as for their ability to predict categorical PDs measured through the screening questionnaire of the International Personality Disorder Examination and to explore the nature of 2 controversial pathological domains: Psychoticism (from the PID-5-SF) and Anankastia (from the PiCD). A total of 1,565 people from the Spanish general population completed the NEO-PI-R, PID-5-SF, and PiCD. A total of 758 also filled out the International Personality Disorder Examination. Results show a high convergent validity of the five-factor model, the PID-5-SF, and the PiCD. Especially relevant from a clinical perspective is the great convergence between the 2 measures of dimensional PDs. In light of the results, the personality correlates of Psychoticism are reconsidered, and the location of Anankastia as the opposite pole of Disinhibition instead of as a separate domain, suggested by previous authors, is supported. The advantages of a dimensional approach to PDs and the practical implications for their assessment are discussed.

show abstract

Section: And Mccabe Andsupporting

confidence: 68%

“…personality correlates of Psychoticism are quite complex and involve different traits (Aluja et al, 2020;García et al, 2020;Zimmermann et al, 2014).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

High convergent validity among the five-factor model, PID-5-SF, and PiCD.

García¹,

Aluja²,

Urieta³

et al. 2022

Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Studies on the ICD-11 PD model and its factorial structure suggested using either a five-factor solution or four-factor solutions, resulting in a single low disinhibition/high anankastia domain (38,(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49). In this multidimensional structure, OCPD could be distinguished by a high score on anankastia traits, automatically resulting in low disinhibition traits.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Eleven (11) publications reported on the factorial structure of the ICD-11 PD model, indicating a 4-factor solution (41,42,44,45,(47)(48)(49), a 5-factor solution (46) or both (38,40,43). All of the studies were conducted in either psychiatry samples, general population samples, or both, while the sample size ranged from 162 to 2,522 participants.…”

Section: Factorial Structure Of the Icd-11 Pd Model Regarding Anankasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Obsessive-Compulsive (Anankastic) Personality Disorder in the ICD-11: A Scoping Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: With the shift from a categorical to a dimensional model, ICD-11 has made substantial changes to the diagnosis of personality disorders (PDs), including obsessive-compulsive (anankastic) personality disorder (OCPD). The ICD-11 PD model proposes a single diagnosis of PD with specifications regarding severity and domains. However, a systematic overview of ICD-11 anankastia is lacking. In this review we address the reformulation of the OCPD diagnosis in the ICD-11, and draw comparisons with the DSM-5, with a particular focus on diagnostic validity and clinical utility. We hypothesized that the ICD-11 PD model provides a diagnostically valid and clinically useful approach to OCPD, with specific emphasis on the anankastia domain as the primary trait qualifier.Methods: Literature published from 2010 to 2020 was systematically searched using the PubMed/MEDLINE, PsychInfo, Cochrane, and Web of Sciences search engines, in order to find all articles that addressed ICD-11 anankastia. Relevant articles were collated, and themes of these articles subsequently extracted.Results: Out of the 264 publications identified, 19 articles were included in this review. Four themes were identified, namely (a) overlap of DSM-5 OCPD with the ICD-11 PD model, (b) the factorial structure of the ICD-11 PD model with respect to the anankastia domain, (c) the clinical utility of the ICD-11 PD model, and (d) comparison of the ICD-11 PD model of anankastia with the DSM-5 alternative model for OCPD.Conclusions: The ICD-11 anankastia domain overlaps with DSM-5 OCPD traits, and the factor analyses of the ICD-11 PD model further support the diagnostic validity of this domain. There is some support for the clinical utility of the ICD-11 PD model of anankastia but further studies are needed, including of its relationship to obsessive-compulsive and related disorders.

show abstract

“…This non‐expected metric of the Social Position variable has been retained because it is the original metric of the index, and to allow for comparisons with examples in the literature where this SPI was used (e.g.,. Aluja, Sayans‐Jiménez, et al, 2020).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the stability of HEXACO‐60 structure and the association of gender, age, and social position with personality traits across 18 countries

Garcı́a

Aluja

Rossier

et al. 2021

Journal of Personality

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The present paper tests the cross‐national stability of the HEXACO‐60 structure across 18 countries from four continents. Gender and age differences across countries will be examined. Finally, this is the first study to explicitly analyze the relationships between the HEXACO and social position. Method Ten thousand two hundred and ninety eight subjects (5,410 women and 4,888 men) from 18 countries and 13 languages were analyzed. Confirmatory factor analysis techniques were used to test configural, metric and scalar invariance models. Congruence coefficients with the original structure of the HEXACO‐60 were computed for every culture. Effect sizes of gender, age, and social position factors across countries were also computed. Results HEXACO‐60 demonstrates configural and metric invariance, but not scalar invariance. Congruence coefficients show a great equivalence in almost all countries and factors. Only Emotionality presents a large gender difference across countries. No relevant effect of age is observed. A profile of high scores on Honesty‐Humility, Extraversion, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience, and low scores on Emotionality increases the likelihood of achieving a higher social position, although the effect sizes are small. Conclusions HEXACO‐60 is a useful instrument to conduct personality trait research and practice around the world. Implications of gender, social position, and country differences are discussed.

show abstract

Location of International Classification of Diseases–11th Revision and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, dimensional trait models in the alternative five-factor personality space.

Cited by 15 publications

References 64 publications

High convergent validity among the five-factor model, PID-5-SF, and PiCD.

High convergent validity among the five-factor model, PID-5-SF, and PiCD.

Obsessive-Compulsive (Anankastic) Personality Disorder in the ICD-11: A Scoping Review

Exploring the stability of HEXACO‐60 structure and the association of gender, age, and social position with personality traits across 18 countries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About