1971
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.27.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Location of theZn 3dStates in ZnO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
0
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The band-structure of wurtzite, zincblende, and rocksalt ZnO has been calculated and measured, when applicable, by X-ray or UV reflection/absorption or emission techniques. The band structure calculated by Rössler using Green's function [Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker (KKR) method] [16] did not agree with experiments [17][18][19][20]. Powell et al [18,19] have carried out UV photoemission measurements on hexagonal ZnO cleaved in vacuum and placed the Zn 3d core level at about 7.5 eV below the valence band maximum, which is 3 eV lower than the value predicted by Rössler [16] band calculation which agreed with X-ray photoemission [21] (8.5 eV) and Ley et al [20] (8.81 eV).…”
Section: Properties Of Znomentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The band-structure of wurtzite, zincblende, and rocksalt ZnO has been calculated and measured, when applicable, by X-ray or UV reflection/absorption or emission techniques. The band structure calculated by Rössler using Green's function [Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker (KKR) method] [16] did not agree with experiments [17][18][19][20]. Powell et al [18,19] have carried out UV photoemission measurements on hexagonal ZnO cleaved in vacuum and placed the Zn 3d core level at about 7.5 eV below the valence band maximum, which is 3 eV lower than the value predicted by Rössler [16] band calculation which agreed with X-ray photoemission [21] (8.5 eV) and Ley et al [20] (8.81 eV).…”
Section: Properties Of Znomentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The band structure calculated by Rössler using Green's function [Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker (KKR) method] [16] did not agree with experiments [17][18][19][20]. Powell et al [18,19] have carried out UV photoemission measurements on hexagonal ZnO cleaved in vacuum and placed the Zn 3d core level at about 7.5 eV below the valence band maximum, which is 3 eV lower than the value predicted by Rössler [16] band calculation which agreed with X-ray photoemission [21] (8.5 eV) and Ley et al [20] (8.81 eV). Local density approximation (LDA) and tight binding methods were carried out [22][23][24][25] by considering the Zn 3d states as core levels to ease calculations.…”
Section: Properties Of Znomentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The latter affects the band gap by placing the localized 3d electrons of Zn at too low binding energies, thus leading to their strong hybridization with the O-2p states. In LSDA the Zn-3d states are about 3 eV too high with respect to the experimental value of about 7.5 eV-8.5 eV 76,77 (see the DOS of ZnO in Fig. 6).…”
Section: Band Gap In Mgxzn1−xo Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, photoemission measurements have variously located the fully occupied Zn 3d semi-core levels at energies ranging from 7.5 to 8.8 eV below the Fermi level. 2,3,4,5,6,7 The close proximity of the 3d level to the O 2p-derived valence band has an appreciable impact on band structure calculations. 8,9,10,11,12,13 As a result, there is a need for bulk sensitive measurements of the ZnO shallow core-level and valence band dispersion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%