2005
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjh196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Location of the Primary Gustatory Area in Humans and its Properties, Studied by Magnetoencephalography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first and last sessions in the behavioral chamber consisted of 15-20 minute periods in which animals were habituated to the behavioral chamber in the absence of tastes. During the middle experimental session (depicted in Figure 1A ), rats received a pseudo-randomized sequence of four standard taste stimuli [sweet: 4 mM saccharin (S); salty: 100 mM sodium chloride (N); neutral: distilled water (W); and bitter: 5 mM quinine hydrochloride (Q)] that varied in hedonic value and fell within the range of concentrations typically used by other groups (3-20 mM saccharin, 10-300 mM sodium chloride, and 1-10 mM quinine; for review, see Frank and Brown, 2003; Kobayakawa et al, 2005; Accolla and Carleton, 2008; Geran and Travers, 2009; Rosen et al, 2010; Chen et al, 2011; MacDonald et al, 2012; Li and Lemon, 2015; Sadacca et al, 2016). Taste solutions were delivered directly onto the tongue in ~40 µL aliquots via four polyamide tubes inserted into the IOC, with a separate tube for each solution to prevent the mixing of tastes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first and last sessions in the behavioral chamber consisted of 15-20 minute periods in which animals were habituated to the behavioral chamber in the absence of tastes. During the middle experimental session (depicted in Figure 1A ), rats received a pseudo-randomized sequence of four standard taste stimuli [sweet: 4 mM saccharin (S); salty: 100 mM sodium chloride (N); neutral: distilled water (W); and bitter: 5 mM quinine hydrochloride (Q)] that varied in hedonic value and fell within the range of concentrations typically used by other groups (3-20 mM saccharin, 10-300 mM sodium chloride, and 1-10 mM quinine; for review, see Frank and Brown, 2003; Kobayakawa et al, 2005; Accolla and Carleton, 2008; Geran and Travers, 2009; Rosen et al, 2010; Chen et al, 2011; MacDonald et al, 2012; Li and Lemon, 2015; Sadacca et al, 2016). Taste solutions were delivered directly onto the tongue in ~40 µL aliquots via four polyamide tubes inserted into the IOC, with a separate tube for each solution to prevent the mixing of tastes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the insula, Small D. M. et al (2003) with fMRI and Kobayakawa T. et al (2005) with MEG found indication of the coding of intensity of taste. O'Doherty J.…”
Section: Intensity Coding Absence Of Chemotopymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…During the middle experimental session (depicted in Fig. 1A), rats received a pseudorandomized sequence of four standard taste stimuli [sweet: 4 mM saccharin (S); salty: 100 mM sodium chloride (N); neutral: distilled water (W); and bitter: 5 mM quinine hydrochloride (Q)] that varied in hedonic value and fell within the range of concentrations typically used in other studies (3-20 mM saccharin, 10 -300 mM sodium chloride, and 1-10 mM quinine; for review, see Frank and Brown, 2003;Kobayakawa et al, 2005;Accolla and Carleton, 2008;Geran and Travers, 2009;Rosen et al, 2010;Chen et al, 2011;MacDonald et al, 2012;Li and Lemon, 2015;Sadacca et al, 2016). Taste solutions were delivered directly onto the tongue in ϳ40 l aliquots via four polyamide tubes inserted into the IOC, with a separate tube for each solution to prevent the mixing of tastes.…”
Section: Passive Taste Administration Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%