2013
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Location‐only and use‐availability data: analysis methods converge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the coefficients of apparent suitability (the gammas) will vary as functions of habitat availability and population density. This is the important distinction that is missing from methods such as environmental niche factor analysis (Hirzel et al 2002) and related multivariate methods, also known as ''profile'' methods (McDonald et al 2013). The dependence of the c's on habitat availability has been previously modeled ), so we focus here on the dependence of apparent habitat suitability on prevailing population density.…”
Section: Connecting Habitat Use To Density-dependent Population Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the coefficients of apparent suitability (the gammas) will vary as functions of habitat availability and population density. This is the important distinction that is missing from methods such as environmental niche factor analysis (Hirzel et al 2002) and related multivariate methods, also known as ''profile'' methods (McDonald et al 2013). The dependence of the c's on habitat availability has been previously modeled ), so we focus here on the dependence of apparent habitat suitability on prevailing population density.…”
Section: Connecting Habitat Use To Density-dependent Population Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…attention (Elith and Leathwick 2009, Sobero´n and Nakamura 2009, Peterson et al 2011, Warren 2012, 2013, McDonald et al 2013, McInerny and Etienne 2013. Their sensitivity on arbitrary scale decisions made by the analyst (Austin 1999, Beyer et al 2010) and instability in changing environments (Randin et al 2006, Zurell et al 2009, McLoughlin et al 2010, Sinclair et al 2010, Wenger and Olden 2012 has alerted practitioners to the dangers of their widespread and unvalidated application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Warton & Shepherd ) and estimation of resource selection functions (Aarts, Fieberg & Matthiopoulos ; McDonald et al . ). PPMs enjoy particular benefits in interpretation and implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Analyses employing space use functions (e.g., resource utilization distribution [UD], resource selection function [RSF], step selection function [SSF]), or some mix of these models have attempted to address resource use for many years (Van Winkle , Manly et al , Fortin et al , Forester et al , McDonald et al , Thurfjell et al , Avgar et al ). The functions attempt to determine what habitats or resources animals are using, given what is available, and how environmental predictor covariates influence that selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%