2014 IEEE PES T&D Conference and Exposition 2014
DOI: 10.1109/tdc.2014.6863515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locational dependence of PV hosting capacity correlated with feeder load

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overloading and overvoltages are the most common indicators utilized to calculate the HC of a distribution system ( [3], [4], [5] and [6] are some examples). It is generally accepted that RES relieve the network loading if the penetration level is low.…”
Section: Overloading and Overvoltagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overloading and overvoltages are the most common indicators utilized to calculate the HC of a distribution system ( [3], [4], [5] and [6] are some examples). It is generally accepted that RES relieve the network loading if the penetration level is low.…”
Section: Overloading and Overvoltagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple rule adopted in the United States consists of allowing the connection of PV generators without detailed investigation if the total PV peak power is lower than 15% of the feeder peak load . However, some feeders may accommodate more or less generation than 15% of the penetration level because it depends on factors such as feeder length, short‐circuit level, PV location, and operating practices . In Reno and Broderick, a study quantifies the accuracy of the 15% limit in 40 real distribution systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18] However, some feeders may accommodate more or less generation than 15% of the penetration level [16][17][18] because it depends on factors such as feeder length, short-circuit level, PV location, and operating practices. 11,19 In Reno and Broderick, 20 a study quantifies the accuracy of the 15% limit in 40 real distribution systems. The authors conclude that there is a significant potential for improvement in connection assessment by adopting more advanced screening approaches, which provides more realistic results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools can help evaluate power system phenomena, such as voltage regulation, fault study, switching transients and harmonics analysis. The simulation tools can also be used to perform the feasibility studies of operating wind turbines and PVs in a distribution system [10,11], analyze the stability of a distribution system with wind and solar power [12,13], determine the maximum penetration or hosting capacity of wind turbines and PVs [14][15][16], evaluate the performance of wind turbine and PV control methods [17,18] and investigate the effects of energy storage systems [19][20][21] and reactive power sources, such as capacitor banks, static var compensators (SVCs), static synchronous compensators (STATCOMs) [19,22,23] and dynamic voltage restorers (DVRs) [24] to a distribution system having wind and PV generators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%