Locator versus stress free implant bar attachments for two -implants immediately loaded by mandibular overdentures. A one year randomized study

Ali, Samer; talawy, Dina El

doi:10.21608/edj.2021.55094.1425

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(25) Several studies also reported that the increased plaque scores with bar attachment may be related to the relieving spaces around the bar and the abutments which lead to gingival hyperplasia that may permit the rotation of overdentures around the bar without implant loading but help plaque to accumulate . (26)(27)(28)(29)(30) Although implant pocket depth increased with time, this increase was not significant. Also, no significant difference in pocket depth between groups was observed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Direct pick-up versus indirect pick-up technique for 4- implants retained single maxillary overdentures with bar attachment: Clinical evaluation.

Darwish

Helmy

2022

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of Statement:This study was conducted to assess the retention and soft tissue condition (gingival index, pocket depth (sound)) of retained implants in the maxilla using bar attachments that were placed using different pick-up techniques (direct and indirect techniques) were manufactured. materials and methods: Twenty patients with edentulous upper arches were divided into two groups according to their treatment modalities. The first group used the direct pick-up technique to place four implants in the canine and molar areas, and the second group used the indirect pickup technique to place four implants in the canine and molar areas. Dental implants were assessed for retention using (force meter analysis) and pre-implant conditions (probing depth and gingival index) were assessed using silliness and low index. These assessments were established at loading, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months later. Data were collected and the values of changes between each successive time were tabulated.Results: There is no statistically significant difference between the two groups observed throughout the study period for changes in retention values between the two groups after a onemonth overdenture insertion. The probing depth showed no significant increase with time. though there was a statistically significant increase in probing depth in Group A (use of bar attachments with direct pick-up technique) than in Group B (use of bar attachments with indirect pick-up technique during prosthesis processing) after 1 month. Conclusion:Overall, bar-retained maxillary implants were associated with a high retention score and satisfactory peri-implant condition.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Direct pick-up versus indirect pick-up technique for 4- implants retained single maxillary overdentures with bar attachment: Clinical evaluation.

Darwish

Helmy

2022

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Las sobredentaduras en el maxilar inferior retenidas por dos implantes colocados en la región interforaminal han sido bien documentadas en investigaciones clínicas y se han sugerido como tratamiento estándar para el paciente desdentado 20 . Ahora bien, es en la rehabilitación del maxilar superior edéntulo con implantes, donde se vislumbran las mayores controversias referidas a esta temática.…”

Section: Las Sobredentaduras Inferiores Y La Evidencia Disponible Como Primera Alternativa Ideal De Tratamiento En La Mandíbula Edéntulaunclassified

Sobredentaduras implantoasistidas en el paciente desdentado total: bases para su indicación

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p>El aumento de la edad de la población y el número relevante de pacientes edéntulos obligan a pensar su tratamiento como una necesidad actual y progresiva. El uso de implantes dentales deviene en alternativas de tratamiento de probada eficacia. Las sobredentaduras como nueva alternativa terapéutica están indicadas siempre en la mandíbula, mientras en el maxilar superior solo si existen piezas dentarias viables en el maxilar inferior. Se buscó literatura relacionada con el tema planteado, para desarrollar esta revisión narrativa, con el fin de estudiar las bases que indican las sobredentaduras implantoasistidas en el paciente desdentado total. La literatura científica internacional sugiere que el tratamiento de un desdentado total con prótesis completa convencional inferior no es actualmente el tratamiento más adecuado. Existe evidencia científica significativa que soporta la elección a priori de una sobredentadura inferior soportada por dos implantes, es vista como primera opción de tratamiento en un desdentado total.</p>

show abstract

Locator versus stress free implant bar attachments for two -implants immediately loaded by mandibular overdentures. A one year randomized study

Cited by 2 publications

References 36 publications

Direct pick-up versus indirect pick-up technique for 4- implants retained single maxillary overdentures with bar attachment: Clinical evaluation.

Direct pick-up versus indirect pick-up technique for 4- implants retained single maxillary overdentures with bar attachment: Clinical evaluation.

Sobredentaduras implantoasistidas en el paciente desdentado total: bases para su indicación

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About